PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYG vs. IVOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYG vs. IVOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYG achieves a 19.06% return, which is significantly higher than IVOV's 10.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLYG having a 11.27% annualized return and IVOV not far behind at 10.71%.


SLYG

1D
3.07%
1M
4.13%
YTD
19.06%
6M
14.09%
1Y
28.19%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*
11.27%

IVOV

1D
1.80%
1M
4.00%
YTD
10.95%
6M
8.24%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*
10.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLYG vs. IVOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
19.06%5.20%9.38%17.27%-21.26%22.42%19.48%20.97%-4.20%14.62%
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
10.95%7.61%11.53%15.38%-7.20%30.50%3.70%25.91%-12.13%12.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYG and IVOV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.86

The correlation between SLYG and IVOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLYG vs. IVOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLYG
IVOV

Technology

20.5%
9.2%

Industrials

19.2%
18.8%

Healthcare

14.3%
3.5%

Financial Services

13.6%
21.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
13.5%

Real Estate

6.2%
9.6%

Energy

4.9%
7.4%

Communication Services

3.0%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
5.5%

Basic Materials

2.7%
6.0%

Utilities

1.9%
4.2%

Technology

SLYG
20.5%
IVOV
9.2%

Industrials

SLYG
19.2%
IVOV
18.8%

Healthcare

SLYG
14.3%
IVOV
3.5%

Financial Services

SLYG
13.6%
IVOV
21.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SLYG
10.7%
IVOV
13.5%

Real Estate

SLYG
6.2%
IVOV
9.6%

Energy

SLYG
4.9%
IVOV
7.4%

Communication Services

SLYG
3.0%
IVOV
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

SLYG
2.9%
IVOV
5.5%

Basic Materials

SLYG
2.7%
IVOV
6.0%

Utilities

SLYG
1.9%
IVOV
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYG vs. IVOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLYG
SLYG Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SLYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLYG vs. IVOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLYGIVOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.24

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

2.02

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.92

6.96

+3.96

SLYG vs. IVOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the IVOV Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYG and IVOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLYG vs. IVOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYG drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, which is greater than IVOV's maximum drawdown of -45.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYG and IVOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYGIVOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.92%

-45.99%

-16.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-10.58%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.39%

-22.61%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.18%

-22.61%

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.86%

-45.99%

+4.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.90%

-5.42%

-9.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

3.07%

-0.48%

Volatility

SLYG vs. IVOV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) at 4.08%. This indicates that SLYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYGIVOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

4.08%

+1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.98%

10.83%

+2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.92%

15.33%

+2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.57%

19.51%

+2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.76%

21.73%

+1.03%

SLYG vs. IVOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLYG vs. IVOV - Dividend Comparison

SLYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than IVOV's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.64%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
0.69%0.86%1.22%1.18%1.18%0.68%0.71%1.08%1.06%4.74%1.13%5.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SLYG and IVOV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SLYG has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to IVOV (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYG dropped -62.92% vs IVOV's -45.99%.

On 10-year performance, SLYG leads with 11.27% vs 10.71% for IVOV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOV has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLYG has performed better with a 11.27% return vs 10.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYG.

IVOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.69% for SLYG.

SLYG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while IVOV is Mid Cap Value Equities. SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYG and 0.10% for IVOV.

SLYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYG and IVOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer