PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SLVP vs. FLKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SLVP vs. FLKR

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVP is a Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SLVP returned 14.15%/yr vs 17.78%/yr for FLKR. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLVP charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.

Performance

SLVP vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLVP achieves a -5.37% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 98.10% return.

SLVP

1D
3.38%
1M
-11.10%
YTD
-5.37%
6M
-0.60%
1Y
81.81%
3Y*
48.97%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
12.67%

FLKR

1D
-0.69%
1M
9.35%
YTD
98.10%
6M
113.45%
1Y
191.57%
3Y*
45.52%
5Y*
17.78%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLVP vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF		-5.37%202.84%14.47%-2.31%-18.06%-23.53%56.45%37.71%-22.10%5.95%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF		98.10%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-21.30%3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SLVP and FLKR is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.32

SLVP vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SLVP
FLKR

Basic Materials

99.6%
1.9%

Financial Services

0.0%
7.5%

Communication Services

-

2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.4%

Energy

-

0.7%

Healthcare

-

2.4%

Industrials

-

14.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

62.9%

Utilities

-

0.3%

Basic Materials

SLVP
99.6%
FLKR
1.9%

Financial Services

SLVP
0.0%
FLKR
7.5%

Communication Services

SLVP

-

FLKR
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SLVP

-

FLKR
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

SLVP

-

FLKR
1.4%

Energy

SLVP

-

FLKR
0.7%

Healthcare

SLVP

-

FLKR
2.4%

Industrials

SLVP

-

FLKR
14.6%

Real Estate

SLVP

-

FLKR

-

Technology

SLVP

-

FLKR
62.9%

Utilities

SLVP

-

FLKR
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF

Often compared with SLVP:
SLVP vs. SLVSLVP vs. SILSLVP vs. SSLN.LSLVP vs. PSLVSLVP vs. SIVRSLVP vs. RINGSLVP vs. SLVR.DE
Often compared with FLKR:
FLKR vs. EWYFLKR vs. SCHDFLKR vs. FLJPFLKR vs. VOOFLKR vs. KORUFLKR vs. HFXIFLKR vs. FLTW

Return for Risk

SLVP vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SLVP
SLVP Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SLVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVP Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVP vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

SLVPFLKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.54
4.08

-2.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.95
3.94

-1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.58

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

8.11

-5.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.86

28.21

-22.35

SLVP vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVP Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 4.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVP and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLVP vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVP drawdown since its inception was -80.47%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVP and FLKR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SLVPFLKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.47%

-50.06%

-30.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.06%

-23.03%

-15.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.06%

-26.39%

-11.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.84%

-49.51%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.03%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.74%

-9.25%

-22.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.78%

-22.03%

-24.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.31%

6.61%

+7.70%

Volatility

SLVP vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) is 19.61%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 25.85%. This indicates that SLVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SLVPFLKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.61%

25.85%

-6.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.17%

42.11%

+3.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.53%

45.82%

+8.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.15%

29.58%

+13.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.45%

28.37%

+14.08%

SLVP vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLVP has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLVP vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than FLKR's 1.95% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF		1.95%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%0.00%0.00%
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF		1.88%1.78%1.05%0.88%0.63%1.63%2.39%2.03%1.28%0.85%2.32%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

SLVP and FLKR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLKR has higher volatility (25.85%) compared to SLVP (19.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVP dropped -80.47% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 17.78% vs 14.15% for SLVP. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SLVP has been the lower-risk option at 19.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 17.78% return vs 14.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SLVP.

FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.88% for SLVP.

SLVP is categorized as Silver, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities. SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SLVP and 0.09% for FLKR.

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.08 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLVP and FLKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer