SLV vs. LVHD
SLV (iShares Silver Trust) and LVHD (Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while LVHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLV returned 13.99%/yr vs 8.41%/yr for LVHD. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for LVHD.
Performance
SLV vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a -4.86% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 10.95% return. Over the past 10 years, SLV has outperformed LVHD with an annualized return of 13.99%, while LVHD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.41% annualized return.
SLV
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -22.76%
- YTD
- -4.86%
- 6M
- 9.25%
- 1Y
- 85.39%
- 3Y*
- 41.27%
- 5Y*
- 18.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
LVHD
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 3.86%
- YTD
- 10.95%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 13.29%
- 3Y*
- 10.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
SLV vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -4.86% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 10.95% | 7.50% | 10.18% | -0.95% | -1.82% | 26.90% | -1.28% | 22.91% | -5.58% | 14.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLV and LVHD is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2015 | 0.14 |
SLV vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLV
LVHD
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
SLV
LVHD
-
Communication Services
SLV
-
LVHD
Consumer Cyclical
SLV
-
LVHD
Consumer Defensive
SLV
-
LVHD
Energy
SLV
-
LVHD
Financial Services
SLV
-
LVHD
Healthcare
SLV
-
LVHD
Industrials
SLV
-
LVHD
Real Estate
SLV
-
LVHD
Technology
SLV
-
LVHD
Utilities
SLV
-
LVHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLV vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank
SLV
LVHD
SLV vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLV | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.23 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 2.16 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 5.43 | -1.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLV vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than LVHD's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and LVHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLV | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.28% | -37.32% | -38.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.40% | -6.17% | -39.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.40% | -14.29% | -31.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.40% | -16.75% | -28.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.40% | -37.32% | -8.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.96% | -1.07% | -40.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.66% | -4.04% | -40.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.88% | 2.46% | +18.42% |
Volatility
SLV vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison
iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 16.34% compared to Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) at 3.54%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLV | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.34% | 3.54% | +12.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.10% | 6.96% | +52.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.82% | 9.77% | +50.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.46% | 12.91% | +23.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.00% | 15.52% | +16.48% |
SLV vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLV vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison
SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 3.27% | 3.35% | 4.23% | 3.55% | 3.30% | 2.56% | 3.27% | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.33% | 2.48% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLV and LVHD have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to LVHD (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLV dropped -76.28% vs LVHD's -37.32%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 13.99% vs 8.41% for LVHD. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 8.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
SLV is categorized as Silver, while LVHD is Dividend. SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price, while LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SLV and 0.27% for LVHD.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLV and LVHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer