SLV vs. AGQ
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ).
SLV and AGQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SLV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Silver Bullion. It was launched on Apr 28, 2006. AGQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Silver (-200%). It was launched on Dec 1, 2008. Both SLV and AGQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SLV or AGQ.
Performance
SLV vs. AGQ - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a 28.74% return, which is significantly lower than AGQ's 42.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SLV has outperformed AGQ with an annualized return of 5.93%, while AGQ has yielded a comparatively lower -0.88% annualized return.
SLV
28.74%
-11.66%
1.78%
29.40%
12.05%
5.93%
AGQ
42.33%
-22.51%
-5.64%
41.34%
5.95%
-0.88%
Key characteristics
SLV | AGQ | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 0.93 | 0.63 |
Sortino Ratio | 1.47 | 1.27 |
Omega Ratio | 1.18 | 1.15 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.50 | 0.41 |
Martin Ratio | 3.71 | 2.33 |
Ulcer Index | 7.76% | 17.07% |
Daily Std Dev | 30.94% | 62.87% |
Max Drawdown | -76.28% | -98.16% |
Current Drawdown | -40.67% | -94.71% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLV vs. AGQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AGQ's 0.93% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between SLV and AGQ is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SLV vs. AGQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SLV vs. AGQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither SLV nor AGQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SLV vs. AGQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, smaller than the maximum AGQ drawdown of -98.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and AGQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SLV vs. AGQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) is 8.27%, while ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a volatility of 16.76%. This indicates that SLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.