SLTY vs. GSEW
SLTY (YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF) and GSEW (Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while GSEW is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index. SLTY is actively managed, while GSEW is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.64, they often move in opposite directions. SLTY charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for GSEW.
Performance
SLTY vs. GSEW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLTY achieves a -8.50% return, which is significantly lower than GSEW's 12.35% return.
SLTY
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- -8.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSEW
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 7.93%
- YTD
- 12.35%
- 1Y
- 17.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.07%
- 10Y*
- —
SLTY vs. GSEW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLTY YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF | -8.50% | -12.61% |
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 12.35% | 3.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLTY and GSEW is -0.64, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | -0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLTY vs. GSEW — Risk / Return Rank
SLTY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GSEW
SLTY vs. GSEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF (SLTY) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLTY | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.29 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLTY vs. GSEW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLTY drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum GSEW drawdown of -38.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLTY and GSEW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLTY | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.27% | -38.65% | +17.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.05% | -0.51% | -19.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.64% | -5.82% | -8.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.03% | — |
Volatility
SLTY vs. GSEW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLTY | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.74% | 12.28% | +5.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 16.95% | +0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 19.11% | -1.37% |
SLTY vs. GSEW - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLTY has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than GSEW's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLTY vs. GSEW - Dividend Comparison
SLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.52%, more than GSEW's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 1.37% | 1.52% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.74% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.66% | 1.56% | 0.54% |
SLTY YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 88.52% | 29.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLTY and GSEW have a correlation of -0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSEW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSEW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for SLTY.
SLTY has the higher dividend yield at 88.52%, compared with 1.37% for GSEW.
SLTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while GSEW is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for SLTY and 0.09% for GSEW.
Find the right allocation for SLTY and GSEW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer