PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLQD vs. SHYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLQD vs. SHYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF (SHYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLQD achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than SHYM's 2.61% return.


SLQD

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.09%
6M
0.87%
YTD
0.91%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
2.54%
10Y*
2.60%

SHYM

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.51%
6M
2.01%
YTD
2.61%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
5.57%
5Y*
0.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLQD vs. SHYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SLQD
iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.91%6.27%4.94%5.98%-4.38%-0.08%
SHYM
iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF
2.61%2.58%6.99%9.67%-15.96%6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SLQD and SHYM is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2021

0.50

The correlation between SLQD and SHYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLQD vs. SHYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLQD
SLQD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SLQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLQD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SLQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLQD Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SHYM
SHYM Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SHYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLQD vs. SHYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF (SHYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLQDSHYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.39

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

2.35

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.05

9.41

+6.64

SLQD vs. SHYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLQD Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the SHYM Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLQD and SHYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLQD vs. SHYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLQD drawdown since its inception was -12.69%, smaller than the maximum SHYM drawdown of -22.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLQD and SHYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLQDSHYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.69%

-22.55%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.06%

-2.23%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.06%

-8.06%

+7.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.63%

-22.55%

+14.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.31%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.87%

-6.63%

+5.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.24%

0.56%

-0.32%

Volatility

SLQD vs. SHYM - Volatility Comparison

iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) has a higher volatility of 0.55% compared to iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF (SHYM) at 0.46%. This indicates that SLQD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLQDSHYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

0.46%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.21%

1.82%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53%

2.74%

-1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.45%

7.06%

-4.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.13%

6.88%

-3.75%

SLQD vs. SHYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLQD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SHYM's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLQD vs. SHYM - Dividend Comparison

SLQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than SHYM's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHYM
iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF
4.29%4.55%4.35%4.35%4.01%2.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLQD
iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.35%4.15%3.71%2.99%2.00%1.67%2.34%2.89%2.55%1.98%1.81%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLQD and SHYM have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLQD has higher volatility (0.55%) compared to SHYM (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLQD dropped -12.69% vs SHYM's -22.55%.

On 5-year performance, SLQD leads with 2.54% vs 0.64% for SHYM. On fees, SLQD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SLQD has performed better with a 2.54% return vs 0.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLQD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SHYM.

SLQD has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 4.29% for SHYM.

SLQD is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SHYM is High Yield Muni. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SLQD and 0.35% for SHYM.

SLQD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLQD and SHYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer