PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLQD vs. SPSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLQD vs. SPSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SLQD having a 0.84% return and SPSB slightly higher at 0.87%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLQD having a 2.63% annualized return and SPSB not far behind at 2.60%.


SLQD

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.84%
6M
1.04%
1Y
4.09%
3Y*
5.38%
5Y*
2.54%
10Y*
2.63%

SPSB

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.87%
6M
1.04%
1Y
3.98%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
2.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLQD vs. SPSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLQD
iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.84%6.27%4.94%5.98%-4.38%-0.61%4.76%6.09%1.09%2.12%
SPSB
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.87%5.86%5.25%5.60%-3.31%-0.20%3.83%5.21%1.45%1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between SLQD and SPSB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2013

0.65

Over the past year, SLQD and SPSB have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.65, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLQD vs. SPSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLQD
SLQD Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SLQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLQD Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SLQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLQD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

SPSB
SPSB Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SPSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPSB Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SPSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPSB Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLQD vs. SPSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLQDSPSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.64

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

4.58

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.40

21.10

-3.70

SLQD vs. SPSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLQD Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the SPSB Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLQD and SPSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLQD vs. SPSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLQD drawdown since its inception was -12.69%, which is greater than SPSB's maximum drawdown of -11.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLQD and SPSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLQDSPSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.69%

-11.75%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.06%

-0.87%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.06%

-0.87%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.63%

-5.96%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.69%

-11.75%

-0.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.20%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.87%

-0.54%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.24%

0.19%

+0.05%

Volatility

SLQD vs. SPSB - Volatility Comparison

iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) has a higher volatility of 0.56% compared to SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPSB) at 0.48%. This indicates that SLQD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLQDSPSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

0.48%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.18%

1.01%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53%

1.37%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.45%

1.99%

+0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.13%

3.06%

+0.07%

SLQD vs. SPSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLQD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SPSB's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLQD vs. SPSB - Dividend Comparison

SLQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than SPSB's 4.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLQD
iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.32%4.15%3.71%2.99%2.00%1.67%2.34%2.89%2.55%1.98%1.81%1.43%
SPSB
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.41%4.55%4.85%4.05%1.92%1.19%1.94%2.77%2.36%1.94%1.65%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SLQD and SPSB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SLQD has higher volatility (0.56%) compared to SPSB (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLQD dropped -12.69% vs SPSB's -11.75%.

On 10-year performance, SLQD leads with 2.63% vs 2.60% for SPSB. On fees, SLQD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLQD has performed better with a 2.63% return vs 2.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLQD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SPSB.

SPSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 4.32% for SLQD.

SLQD tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade 0-5 Index, while SPSB tracks Bloomberg Barclays U.S. 1-3 Year Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SLQD and 0.07% for SPSB.

SPSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLQD and SPSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer