PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHYM vs. CGHM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHYM vs. CGHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF (SHYM) and Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SHYM having a 1.67% return and CGHM slightly higher at 1.75%.


SHYM

1D
-0.05%
1M
-1.14%
6M
0.76%
YTD
1.67%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
5.36%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.75%

CGHM

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.68%
6M
1.34%
YTD
1.75%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.31M$10.88M$11.27M
$4.04M$4.20M$7.86M

SHYM vs. CGHM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SHYM and CGHM is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2024

0.63

The correlation between SHYM and CGHM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHYM vs. CGHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SHYM
SHYM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SHYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYM Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

CGHM
CGHM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CGHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGHM Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CGHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGHM Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SHYM vs. CGHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF (SHYM) and Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHYMCGHMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.57

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

3.22

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.49

11.90

-4.42

SHYM vs. CGHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHYM Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the CGHM Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHYM and CGHM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHYM vs. CGHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHYM drawdown since its inception was -22.55%, which is greater than CGHM's maximum drawdown of -5.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYM and CGHM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYMCGHMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.55%

-5.90%

-16.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.23%

-2.55%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-1.71%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-1.19%

-5.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

0.69%

-0.10%

Volatility

SHYM vs. CGHM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF (SHYM) and Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) have volatilities of 0.89% and 0.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYMCGHMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

0.91%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.96%

2.41%

-0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80%

3.13%

-0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.06%

4.42%

+2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.85%

4.42%

+2.43%

SHYM vs. CGHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHYM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CGHM's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHYM vs. CGHM - Dividend Comparison

SHYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than CGHM's 3.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CGHM
Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF
3.70%3.61%1.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHYM
iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF
3.99%4.55%4.35%4.35%4.01%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHYM and CGHM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGHM has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to SHYM (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHYM dropped -22.55% vs CGHM's -5.90%.

On 1-year performance, CGHM leads with 7.43% vs 4.26% for SHYM. On fees, CGHM is cheaper at 0.34% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CGHM has performed better with a 7.43% return vs 4.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGHM is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SHYM.

SHYM has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 3.70% for CGHM.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SHYM and 0.34% for CGHM.

CGHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHYM and CGHM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer