PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLQD vs. PSEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLQD vs. PSEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and Prospect Capital Corporation (PSEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLQD achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than PSEC's -7.97% return. Over the past 10 years, SLQD has outperformed PSEC with an annualized return of 2.60%, while PSEC has yielded a comparatively lower -1.34% annualized return.


SLQD

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.14%
6M
0.70%
YTD
1.10%
1Y
3.24%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
2.53%
10Y*
2.60%
ALL TIME*
2.50%

PSEC

1D
-0.93%
1M
-3.39%
6M
-15.30%
YTD
-7.97%
1Y
-12.70%
3Y*
-19.12%
5Y*
-12.77%
10Y*
-1.34%
ALL TIME*
2.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.66M$10.26M$12.77M
$10.60M$10.54M$10.26M

SLQD vs. PSEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLQD
iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
1.10%6.27%4.94%5.98%-4.38%-0.61%4.76%6.09%1.09%2.12%
PSEC
Prospect Capital Corporation
-7.97%-28.86%-18.16%-4.13%-8.61%70.00%-3.54%13.83%4.09%-9.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SLQD and PSEC is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2013

0.07

The correlation between SLQD and PSEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLQD vs. PSEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SLQD
SLQD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SLQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLQD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SLQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLQD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

PSEC
PSEC Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PSEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSEC Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
PSEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSEC Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SLQD vs. PSEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and Prospect Capital Corporation (PSEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLQDPSECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

0.94

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

-0.63

+4.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.40

-1.35

+16.75

SLQD vs. PSEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLQD Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the PSEC Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLQD and PSEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLQD vs. PSEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLQD drawdown since its inception was -12.69%, smaller than the maximum PSEC drawdown of -61.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLQD and PSEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLQDPSECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.69%

-61.51%

+48.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.06%

-25.88%

+24.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.06%

-50.53%

+49.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.63%

-57.21%

+49.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.69%

-57.21%

+44.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-55.59%

+55.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.86%

-15.88%

+15.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.24%

12.76%

-12.52%

Volatility

SLQD vs. PSEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) is 0.42%, while Prospect Capital Corporation (PSEC) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that SLQD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLQDPSECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

9.43%

-9.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.24%

27.11%

-25.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54%

34.80%

-33.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.45%

28.17%

-25.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.13%

27.53%

-24.40%

Dividends

SLQD vs. PSEC - Dividend Comparison

SLQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than PSEC's 23.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSEC
Prospect Capital Corporation
23.94%20.85%16.01%12.02%10.30%8.56%13.31%11.18%11.41%13.45%11.98%14.72%
SLQD
iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
3.99%4.15%3.71%2.99%2.00%1.67%2.34%2.89%2.55%1.98%1.81%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLQD and PSEC have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSEC has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to SLQD (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLQD dropped -12.69% vs PSEC's -61.51%.

SLQD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLQD and PSEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer