PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SLQD vs. VCSH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


SLQDVCSH
YTD Return4.42%4.41%
1Y Return6.92%7.33%
3Y Return (Ann)1.89%1.51%
5Y Return (Ann)2.06%1.91%
10Y Return (Ann)2.23%2.30%
Sharpe Ratio3.573.13
Sortino Ratio6.065.09
Omega Ratio1.801.65
Calmar Ratio3.602.14
Martin Ratio25.0118.73
Ulcer Index0.30%0.43%
Daily Std Dev2.10%2.55%
Max Drawdown-12.69%-12.86%
Current Drawdown-0.64%-1.04%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between SLQD and VCSH is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

SLQD vs. VCSH - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SLQD having a 4.42% return and VCSH slightly lower at 4.41%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLQD having a 2.23% annualized return and VCSH not far ahead at 2.30%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.26%
3.41%
SLQD
VCSH

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SLQD vs. VCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLQD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VCSH's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


SLQD
iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for SLQD: current value at 0.06% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.06%
Expense ratio chart for VCSH: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SLQD vs. VCSH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLQD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SLQD, currently valued at 3.57, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.003.57
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SLQD, currently valued at 6.06, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.006.06
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SLQD, currently valued at 1.80, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.80
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SLQD, currently valued at 3.60, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.60
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SLQD, currently valued at 25.01, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0025.01
VCSH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VCSH, currently valued at 3.13, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.003.13
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VCSH, currently valued at 5.09, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.005.09
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VCSH, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.65
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VCSH, currently valued at 2.14, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.14
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VCSH, currently valued at 18.73, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0018.73

SLQD vs. VCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLQD Sharpe Ratio is 3.57, which is comparable to the VCSH Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLQD and VCSH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.002.503.003.504.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.57
3.13
SLQD
VCSH

Dividends

SLQD vs. VCSH - Dividend Comparison

SLQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than VCSH's 3.82% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SLQD
iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
3.60%2.99%2.00%1.67%2.34%2.89%2.56%1.98%1.81%1.43%1.24%0.23%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
3.82%3.09%2.01%1.81%2.27%2.87%2.65%2.25%2.10%2.08%2.01%2.05%

Drawdowns

SLQD vs. VCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLQD drawdown since its inception was -12.69%, roughly equal to the maximum VCSH drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLQD and VCSH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-1.20%-1.00%-0.80%-0.60%-0.40%-0.20%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.64%
-1.04%
SLQD
VCSH

Volatility

SLQD vs. VCSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) is 0.53%, while Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) has a volatility of 0.67%. This indicates that SLQD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.30%0.40%0.50%0.60%0.70%0.80%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.53%
0.67%
SLQD
VCSH