SLQD vs. IGSB
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and iShares Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB).
SLQD and IGSB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SLQD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade 0-5 Index. It was launched on Oct 15, 2013. IGSB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE BofAML 1-5 Year US Corporate Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. Both SLQD and IGSB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SLQD or IGSB.
Correlation
The correlation between SLQD and IGSB is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SLQD vs. IGSB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SLQD:
3.29
IGSB:
3.03
SLQD:
5.12
IGSB:
4.67
SLQD:
1.78
IGSB:
1.64
SLQD:
7.47
IGSB:
5.53
SLQD:
22.91
IGSB:
16.23
SLQD:
0.30%
IGSB:
0.46%
SLQD:
2.08%
IGSB:
2.44%
SLQD:
-12.69%
IGSB:
-13.38%
SLQD:
0.00%
IGSB:
-0.04%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLQD achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly lower than IGSB's 2.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLQD having a 2.34% annualized return and IGSB not far ahead at 2.38%.
SLQD
2.12%
0.64%
2.59%
7.01%
2.27%
2.34%
IGSB
2.38%
0.66%
2.74%
7.58%
2.37%
2.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLQD vs. IGSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SLQD and IGSB have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SLQD vs. IGSB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SLQD
IGSB
SLQD vs. IGSB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and iShares Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SLQD vs. IGSB - Dividend Comparison
SLQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than IGSB's 4.14% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLQD iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 3.81% | 3.71% | 2.99% | 2.00% | 1.54% | 2.32% | 2.89% | 2.55% | 1.98% | 1.81% | 1.43% | 1.24% |
IGSB iShares Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.14% | 4.02% | 3.26% | 2.07% | 1.82% | 2.37% | 3.07% | 2.46% | 1.65% | 1.45% | 1.18% | 0.94% |
Drawdowns
SLQD vs. IGSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLQD drawdown since its inception was -12.69%, smaller than the maximum IGSB drawdown of -13.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLQD and IGSB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SLQD vs. IGSB - Volatility Comparison
iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and iShares Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB) have volatilities of 1.30% and 1.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.