SLQD vs. IGSB
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and iShares Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB).
SLQD and IGSB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SLQD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade 0-5 Index. It was launched on Oct 15, 2013. IGSB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE BofAML 1-5 Year US Corporate Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. Both SLQD and IGSB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SLQD or IGSB.
Performance
SLQD vs. IGSB - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SLQD having a 4.42% return and IGSB slightly higher at 4.56%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLQD having a 2.22% annualized return and IGSB not far behind at 2.17%.
SLQD
4.42%
-0.28%
3.34%
6.86%
2.05%
2.22%
IGSB
4.56%
-0.43%
3.59%
7.40%
2.01%
2.17%
Key characteristics
| SLQD | IGSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.38 | 2.93 |
| Sortino Ratio | 5.58 | 4.64 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.74 | 1.59 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.66 | 2.26 |
| Martin Ratio | 22.17 | 16.95 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.31% | 0.44% |
| Daily Std Dev | 2.02% | 2.54% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.69% | -13.38% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.64% | -0.96% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLQD vs. IGSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SLQD and IGSB have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between SLQD and IGSB is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SLQD vs. IGSB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and iShares Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SLQD vs. IGSB - Dividend Comparison
SLQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than IGSB's 3.91% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLQD iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 3.60% | 2.99% | 2.00% | 1.67% | 2.34% | 2.89% | 2.56% | 1.98% | 1.81% | 1.43% | 1.24% | 0.23% |
IGSB iShares Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 3.91% | 3.26% | 2.07% | 1.82% | 2.37% | 3.07% | 2.46% | 1.65% | 1.45% | 1.18% | 0.94% | 1.17% |
Drawdowns
SLQD vs. IGSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLQD drawdown since its inception was -12.69%, smaller than the maximum IGSB drawdown of -13.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLQD and IGSB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SLQD vs. IGSB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) is 0.54%, while iShares Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB) has a volatility of 0.69%. This indicates that SLQD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.