PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHYM vs. MUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHYM vs. MUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF (SHYM) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHYM achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly higher than MUB's 0.21% return.


SHYM

1D
-0.05%
1M
-1.14%
6M
0.76%
YTD
1.67%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
5.36%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.75%

MUB

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.73%
6M
-0.48%
YTD
0.21%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
2.86%
5Y*
0.55%
10Y*
1.79%
ALL TIME*
3.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$531.87M$437.83M$388.20M
$4.04M$4.20M$7.86M

SHYM vs. MUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SHYM
iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF
1.67%2.58%6.99%9.67%-15.96%6.71%
MUB
iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF
0.21%3.78%1.26%5.56%-7.34%1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SHYM and MUB is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2021

0.68

The correlation between SHYM and MUB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHYM vs. MUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SHYM
SHYM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SHYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYM Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

MUB
MUB Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUB Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUB Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SHYM vs. MUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF (SHYM) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHYMMUBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.34

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

1.80

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.49

5.86

+1.63

SHYM vs. MUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHYM Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the MUB Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHYM and MUB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHYM vs. MUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHYM drawdown since its inception was -22.55%, which is greater than MUB's maximum drawdown of -13.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYM and MUB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYMMUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.55%

-13.68%

-8.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.23%

-2.79%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.06%

-4.78%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.30%

-11.78%

-10.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-1.79%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-2.22%

-4.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

0.86%

-0.27%

Volatility

SHYM vs. MUB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF (SHYM) is 0.89%, while iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) has a volatility of 0.96%. This indicates that SHYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYMMUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

0.96%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.96%

2.41%

-0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80%

2.98%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.06%

4.09%

+2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.85%

4.91%

+1.94%

SHYM vs. MUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHYM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MUB's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHYM vs. MUB - Dividend Comparison

SHYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than MUB's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUB
iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF
2.96%3.14%3.01%2.65%2.11%1.81%2.11%2.42%2.46%2.26%2.21%2.51%
SHYM
iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF
3.99%4.55%4.35%4.35%4.01%2.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHYM and MUB have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUB has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to SHYM (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHYM dropped -22.55% vs MUB's -13.68%.

On 5-year performance, MUB leads with 0.55% vs 0.39% for SHYM. On fees, MUB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MUB has performed better with a 0.55% return vs 0.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MUB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SHYM.

SHYM has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 2.96% for MUB.

SHYM is categorized as High Yield Muni, while MUB is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SHYM and 0.07% for MUB.

MUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHYM and MUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer