SLON vs. QLD

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SLON (ProShares Ultra Solana ETF) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - SLON is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Solana Index, while QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SLON returned -91.50% vs 48.13% for QLD. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLON charges 2.14%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QLD.

Performance

SLON vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -73.34% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 25.90% return.

SLON

• 1D: -3.36%
• 1M: 2.08%
• 6M: -79.21%
• YTD: -73.34%
• 1Y: -91.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QLD

• 1D: -3.32%
• 1M: -7.16%
• 6M: 23.22%
• YTD: 25.90%
• 1Y: 48.13%
• 3Y*: 37.48%
• 5Y*: 19.69%
• 10Y*: 33.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLON vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF	-73.34%	-62.89%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	25.90%	18.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SLON and QLD is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	0.45

Return for Risk

SLON vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLON

SLON Risk / Return Rank: 3
SLON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
SLON Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
SLON Omega Ratio Rank: 3
SLON Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SLON Martin Ratio Rank: 3

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 44
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 42
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLON vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLON	QLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.63	1.30	-1.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.31	1.78	-3.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.23	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.95	1.92	-2.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.22	6.24	-7.46

SLON vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLON Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLON and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SLON vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -96.31%, which is greater than QLD's maximum drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and QLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLON	QLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.31%	-83.13%	-13.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.31%	-25.13%	-71.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-42.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-63.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.99%	-11.84%	-83.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.19%	-18.11%	-49.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	74.75%	7.73%	+67.02%

Volatility

SLON vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) has a higher volatility of 36.69% compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) at 14.98%. This indicates that SLON's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLON	QLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	36.69%	14.98%	+21.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	105.49%	30.86%	+74.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	147.41%	37.22%	+110.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	147.12%	45.59%	+101.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	147.12%	44.86%	+102.26%

SLON vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLON vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.54%, more than QLD's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.13%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF	21.54%	5.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLON and QLD in my portfolio?

SLON and QLD have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLON or QLD?

SLON has higher volatility (36.69%) compared to QLD (14.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLON dropped -96.31% vs QLD's -83.13%.

Which ETF is better, SLON or QLD?

On 1-year performance, QLD leads with 48.13% vs -91.50% for SLON. On fees, QLD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QLD has been the lower-risk option at 14.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SLON or QLD?

Over the 1-year period, QLD has performed better with a 48.13% return vs -91.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLON or QLD?

QLD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLON or QLD?

SLON has the higher dividend yield at 21.54%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.

What is the main difference between SLON and QLD?

SLON is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while QLD is Leveraged Equities. SLON tracks Bloomberg Solana Index, while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.95% for QLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.