SLON vs. BRLN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SLON (ProShares Ultra Solana ETF) and BRLN (BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLON is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Solana Index, while BRLN is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by BlackRock. SLON is passively managed, while BRLN is actively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLON charges 2.14%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for BRLN.

Performance

SLON vs. BRLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -74.41% return, which is significantly lower than BRLN's 1.35% return.

SLON

• 1D: -9.37%
• 1M: -30.10%
• YTD: -74.41%
• 6M: -81.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BRLN

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.94%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: 2.23%
• 1Y: 5.10%
• 3Y*: 7.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLON vs. BRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF	-74.41%	-62.58%
BRLN BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF	1.35%	2.58%

Correlation

The correlation between SLON and BRLN is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

SLON vs. BRLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRLN

BRLN Risk / Return Rank: 52
BRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
BRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 51
BRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
BRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLON vs. BRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLON	BRLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.63	2.19	-2.82

Drawdowns

SLON vs. BRLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -95.19%, which is greater than BRLN's maximum drawdown of -3.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and BRLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLON	BRLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.19%	-3.85%	-91.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.00%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.19%	-0.21%	-94.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.84%	-0.31%	-63.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SLON	BRLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.81%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	146.78%	3.06%	+143.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	146.78%	3.73%	+143.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	146.78%	3.73%	+143.05%

SLON vs. BRLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BRLN's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLON vs. BRLN - Dividend Comparison

SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.44%, more than BRLN's 6.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BRLN BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF	6.35%	6.50%	7.87%	9.06%	1.48%
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF	22.44%	5.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLON and BRLN in my portfolio?

SLON and BRLN have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SLON or BRLN?

On fees, BRLN is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLON or BRLN?

BRLN is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLON or BRLN?

SLON has the higher dividend yield at 22.44%, compared with 6.35% for BRLN.

What is the main difference between SLON and BRLN?

SLON is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BRLN is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.55% for BRLN.