PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SKF vs. PSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SKF vs. PSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) and ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SKF achieves a 15.68% return, which is significantly higher than PSQ's -16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, SKF has underperformed PSQ with an annualized return of -25.91%, while PSQ has yielded a comparatively higher -19.23% annualized return.


SKF

1D
2.34%
1M
3.32%
YTD
15.68%
6M
10.42%
1Y
2.16%
3Y*
-24.34%
5Y*
-15.11%
10Y*
-25.91%

PSQ

1D
0.28%
1M
-9.35%
YTD
-16.45%
6M
-14.96%
1Y
-26.29%
3Y*
-18.98%
5Y*
-14.55%
10Y*
-19.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SKF vs. PSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SKF
ProShares UltraShort Financials
15.68%-23.99%-36.29%-21.78%17.63%-47.66%-42.40%-42.97%16.42%-31.70%
PSQ
ProShares Short QQQ
-16.45%-15.51%-15.68%-32.01%36.40%-24.84%-41.23%-27.49%-2.34%-24.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SKF and PSQ is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between SKF and PSQ has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SKF vs. PSQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SKF
PSQ

Financial Services

48.0%
74.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

SKF
48.0%
PSQ
74.7%

Basic Materials

SKF

-

PSQ

-

Communication Services

SKF

-

PSQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

SKF

-

PSQ

-

Consumer Defensive

SKF

-

PSQ

-

Energy

SKF

-

PSQ

-

Healthcare

SKF

-

PSQ

-

Industrials

SKF

-

PSQ

-

Real Estate

SKF

-

PSQ

-

Technology

SKF

-

PSQ

-

Utilities

SKF

-

PSQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SKF vs. PSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKF
SKF Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SKF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKF Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SKF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKF Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

PSQ
PSQ Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
PSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
PSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKF vs. PSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) and ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SKFPSQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.74

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

-0.98

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

-2.12

+2.32

SKF vs. PSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SKF Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is higher than the PSQ Sharpe Ratio of -1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKF and PSQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SKFPSQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

-1.65

+1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

-0.65

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.64

-0.87

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.51

-0.76

+0.26

Drawdowns

SKF vs. PSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKF drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, roughly equal to the maximum PSQ drawdown of -98.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKF and PSQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SKFPSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.96%

-98.26%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.76%

-26.93%

+6.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.09%

-49.65%

-18.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.40%

-60.91%

-11.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.51%

-88.98%

-7.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.95%

-98.25%

-1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.26%

-73.97%

-15.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.13%

12.41%

-1.28%

Volatility

SKF vs. PSQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) at 4.50%. This indicates that SKF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SKFPSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

4.50%

+1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.80%

12.14%

+9.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.85%

16.01%

+12.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.03%

22.43%

+13.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.90%

22.25%

+18.65%

SKF vs. PSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SKF and PSQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

SKF vs. PSQ - Dividend Comparison

SKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than PSQ's 5.24% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSQ
ProShares Short QQQ
5.24%4.97%7.15%6.01%0.35%0.00%0.31%1.75%0.95%0.02%
SKF
ProShares UltraShort Financials
4.09%5.61%7.94%3.93%0.03%0.00%0.11%1.29%0.06%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SKF and PSQ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SKF has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to PSQ (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKF dropped -99.96% vs PSQ's -98.26%.

On 10-year performance, PSQ leads with -19.23% vs -25.91% for SKF. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, PSQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PSQ has performed better with a -19.23% return vs -25.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SKF and PSQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

PSQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 4.09% for SKF.

SKF is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PSQ is Inverse Equities. SKF tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Financials -IND (-200%), while PSQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%).

SKF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SKF and PSQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer