SKF vs. PSQ
SKF (ProShares UltraShort Financials) and PSQ (ProShares Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - SKF is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the DJ Global United States (All) / Financials -IND (-200%), while PSQ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SKF returned -27.50%/yr vs -19.32%/yr for PSQ. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SKF vs. PSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKF achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly higher than PSQ's -13.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SKF has underperformed PSQ with an annualized return of -27.50%, while PSQ has yielded a comparatively higher -19.32% annualized return.
SKF
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -7.49%
- YTD
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- -10.08%
- 3Y*
- -27.28%
- 5Y*
- -17.96%
- 10Y*
- -27.50%
PSQ
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- -13.33%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- -23.10%
- 3Y*
- -17.43%
- 5Y*
- -13.16%
- 10Y*
- -19.32%
SKF vs. PSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | 2.60% | -23.99% | -36.29% | -21.78% | 17.63% | -47.66% | -42.40% | -42.97% | 16.42% | -31.70% |
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | -13.33% | -15.51% | -15.68% | -32.01% | 36.40% | -24.84% | -41.23% | -27.49% | -2.34% | -24.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKF and PSQ is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SKF and PSQ has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SKF vs. PSQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SKF
PSQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SKF
PSQ
Basic Materials
SKF
-
PSQ
-
Communication Services
SKF
-
PSQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
SKF
-
PSQ
-
Consumer Defensive
SKF
-
PSQ
-
Energy
SKF
-
PSQ
-
Healthcare
SKF
-
PSQ
-
Industrials
SKF
-
PSQ
-
Real Estate
SKF
-
PSQ
-
Technology
SKF
-
PSQ
-
Utilities
SKF
-
PSQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKF vs. PSQ — Risk / Return Rank
SKF
PSQ
SKF vs. PSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) and ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SKF | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.79 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | -0.93 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | -1.99 | +0.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SKF vs. PSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKF drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, roughly equal to the maximum PSQ drawdown of -98.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKF and PSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKF | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -98.26% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.02% | -24.95% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.09% | -49.65% | -18.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.40% | -60.91% | -11.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.51% | -88.98% | -7.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.95% | -98.19% | -1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.27% | -74.02% | -15.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.95% | 12.74% | -2.79% |
Volatility
SKF vs. PSQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) is 8.32%, while ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) has a volatility of 8.93%. This indicates that SKF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKF | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.32% | 8.93% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.47% | 14.46% | +8.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.21% | 17.94% | +11.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.04% | 22.72% | +13.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.82% | 22.37% | +18.45% |
SKF vs. PSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SKF and PSQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SKF vs. PSQ - Dividend Comparison
SKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, less than PSQ's 5.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | 5.05% | 4.97% | 7.15% | 6.01% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.75% | 0.95% | 0.02% |
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | 4.61% | 5.61% | 7.94% | 3.93% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.29% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKF and PSQ have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSQ has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to SKF (8.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKF dropped -99.96% vs PSQ's -98.26%.
On 10-year performance, PSQ leads with -19.32% vs -27.50% for SKF. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SKF has been the lower-risk option at 8.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSQ has performed better with a -19.32% return vs -27.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SKF and PSQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
PSQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 4.61% for SKF.
SKF is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PSQ is Inverse Equities. SKF tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Financials -IND (-200%), while PSQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%).
SKF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.35 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKF and PSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer