SKF vs. PSQ
SKF (ProShares UltraShort Financials) and PSQ (ProShares Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - SKF is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the DJ Global United States (All) / Financials -IND (-200%), while PSQ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SKF returned -27.13%/yr vs -18.71%/yr for PSQ. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SKF vs. PSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKF achieves a -5.00% return, which is significantly higher than PSQ's -12.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SKF has underperformed PSQ with an annualized return of -27.13%, while PSQ has yielded a comparatively higher -18.71% annualized return.
SKF
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -9.77%
- 6M
- -3.25%
- YTD
- -5.00%
- 1Y
- -12.40%
- 3Y*
- -27.16%
- 5Y*
- -18.85%
- 10Y*
- -27.13%
PSQ
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- 6M
- -11.29%
- YTD
- -12.96%
- 1Y
- -19.78%
- 3Y*
- -16.20%
- 5Y*
- -12.44%
- 10Y*
- -18.71%
SKF vs. PSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | -5.00% | -23.99% | -36.29% | -21.78% | 17.63% | -47.66% | -42.40% | -42.97% | 16.42% | -31.70% |
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | -12.96% | -15.51% | -15.68% | -32.01% | 36.40% | -24.84% | -41.23% | -27.49% | -2.34% | -24.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKF and PSQ is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SKF and PSQ has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SKF vs. PSQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SKF
PSQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SKF
PSQ
Basic Materials
SKF
-
PSQ
-
Communication Services
SKF
-
PSQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
SKF
-
PSQ
-
Consumer Defensive
SKF
-
PSQ
-
Energy
SKF
-
PSQ
-
Healthcare
SKF
-
PSQ
-
Industrials
SKF
-
PSQ
-
Real Estate
SKF
-
PSQ
-
Technology
SKF
-
PSQ
-
Utilities
SKF
-
PSQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKF vs. PSQ — Risk / Return Rank
SKF
PSQ
SKF vs. PSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) and ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SKF | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.83 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | -0.80 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | -1.67 | +0.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SKF vs. PSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKF drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, roughly equal to the maximum PSQ drawdown of -98.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKF and PSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKF | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -98.26% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.08% | -24.83% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.09% | -49.65% | -18.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.40% | -60.91% | -11.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.83% | -87.94% | -7.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -98.18% | -1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.30% | -74.08% | -15.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.99% | 11.88% | -0.89% |
Volatility
SKF vs. PSQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) and ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) have volatilities of 8.58% and 8.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKF | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.58% | 8.62% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.76% | 15.32% | +7.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.50% | 18.59% | +10.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.03% | 22.82% | +13.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.76% | 22.40% | +18.36% |
SKF vs. PSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SKF and PSQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SKF vs. PSQ - Dividend Comparison
SKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than PSQ's 4.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | 4.40% | 4.97% | 7.15% | 6.01% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.75% | 0.95% | 0.02% |
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | 4.51% | 5.61% | 7.94% | 3.93% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.29% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKF and PSQ have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSQ has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to SKF (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKF dropped -99.96% vs PSQ's -98.26%.
On 10-year performance, PSQ leads with -18.71% vs -27.13% for SKF. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSQ has performed better with a -18.71% return vs -27.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SKF and PSQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SKF has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 4.40% for PSQ.
SKF is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PSQ is Inverse Equities. SKF tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Financials -IND (-200%), while PSQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%).
SKF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.42 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKF and PSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer