PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SKF vs. AUMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SKF vs. AUMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) and Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SKF vs. AUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SKF
ProShares UltraShort Financials
21.76%-23.99%-36.29%-2.82%
AUMI
Themes Gold Miners ETF
10.53%164.18%30.61%4.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SKF achieves a 21.76% return, which is significantly higher than AUMI's 10.53% return.


SKF

1D
0.06%
1M
6.91%
YTD
21.76%
6M
16.27%
1Y
-1.91%
3Y*
-23.89%
5Y*
-17.64%
10Y*
-26.15%

AUMI

1D
5.17%
1M
-16.46%
YTD
10.53%
6M
26.21%
1Y
116.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SKF vs. AUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SKF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AUMI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SKF vs. AUMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKF
SKF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SKF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKF Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
SKF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKF Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

AUMI
AUMI Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
AUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKF vs. AUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) and Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SKFAUMIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.05

2.35

-2.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.22

2.57

-2.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.36

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

3.66

-3.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.05

12.93

-12.99

SKF vs. AUMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SKF Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the AUMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKF and AUMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SKFAUMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

2.35

-2.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.50

2.01

-2.51

Correlation

The correlation between SKF and AUMI is -0.11. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

SKF vs. AUMI - Dividend Comparison

SKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than AUMI's 0.78% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SKF
ProShares UltraShort Financials
3.88%5.61%7.94%3.93%0.03%0.00%0.11%1.29%0.06%
AUMI
Themes Gold Miners ETF
0.78%0.86%1.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SKF vs. AUMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKF drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than AUMI's maximum drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKF and AUMI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SKFAUMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.96%

-31.88%

-68.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.47%

-31.88%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.95%

-16.84%

-83.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.17%

-6.00%

-83.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.27%

9.03%

+20.24%

Volatility

SKF vs. AUMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) is 9.64%, while Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) has a volatility of 18.77%. This indicates that SKF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SKFAUMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.64%

18.77%

-9.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.75%

40.65%

-17.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.59%

49.65%

-11.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.04%

41.38%

-5.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.94%

41.38%

-0.44%