SJM vs. KMB
SJM (The J. M. Smucker Company) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — SJM in Packaged Foods, KMB in Household & Personal Products. Over the past 10 years, SJM returned 0.34%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for KMB. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SJM vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SJM achieves a 20.85% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's 9.91% return. Over the past 10 years, SJM has underperformed KMB with an annualized return of 0.34%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively higher 1.33% annualized return.
SJM
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- 6M
- 14.54%
- YTD
- 20.85%
- 1Y
- 14.60%
- 3Y*
- -5.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.24%
- 10Y*
- 0.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.15%
KMB
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 5.35%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 1Y
- -10.55%
- 3Y*
- -3.84%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- 1.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.88%
SJM vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SJM The J. M. Smucker Company | 20.85% | -7.56% | -9.61% | -17.79% | 20.06% | 21.05% | 14.50% | 14.90% | -22.58% | -0.49% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 9.91% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between SJM and KMB is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 1994 | 0.34 |
The correlation between SJM and KMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SJM:
$12.37B
KMB:
$35.87B
SJM:
-$1.30
KMB:
$5.93
SJM:
1.36
KMB:
2.18
SJM:
2.23
KMB:
20.05
SJM:
$9.05B
KMB:
$16.54B
SJM:
$3.03B
KMB:
$5.93B
SJM:
$360.20M
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SJM vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
SJM
KMB
SJM vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SJM | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.95 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | -0.36 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.55 | -0.53 | +2.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SJM vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SJM drawdown since its inception was -45.67%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJM and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SJM | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.67% | -36.97% | -8.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.82% | -29.60% | +6.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.16% | -34.06% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.11% | -34.06% | -4.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.11% | -34.06% | -4.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.10% | -22.38% | +3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.50% | -8.88% | -4.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.45% | 20.13% | -10.68% |
Volatility
SJM vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) has a higher volatility of 10.20% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 8.94%. This indicates that SJM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SJM | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.20% | 8.94% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.17% | 18.50% | +3.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.58% | 26.96% | +1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.68% | 20.56% | +4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.66% | 21.22% | +3.44% |
Dividends
SJM vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
SJM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than KMB's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.70% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
SJM The J. M. Smucker Company | 3.80% | 4.46% | 3.89% | 3.29% | 2.54% | 2.78% | 3.08% | 3.32% | 3.49% | 2.46% | 2.22% | 2.12% |
Financials
SJM vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The J. M. Smucker Company and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SJM vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
SJM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The J. M. Smucker Company reported a gross profit of 941.10M and revenue of 2.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.5%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
SJM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The J. M. Smucker Company reported an operating income of -542.70M and revenue of 2.27B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.9%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
SJM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The J. M. Smucker Company reported a net income of 388.10M and revenue of 2.27B, resulting in a net margin of 17.1%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SJM and KMB have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SJM has higher volatility (10.20%) compared to KMB (8.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJM dropped -45.67% vs KMB's -36.97%.
SJM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SJM and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer