SJM vs. KMB
SJM (The J. M. Smucker Company) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — SJM in Packaged Foods, KMB in Household & Personal Products. Over the past 10 years, SJM returned 1.01%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KMB. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SJM vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SJM achieves a 21.63% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, SJM has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 1.01%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.95% annualized return.
SJM
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 15.86%
- YTD
- 21.63%
- 6M
- 17.12%
- 1Y
- 26.78%
- 3Y*
- -4.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.30%
- 10Y*
- 1.01%
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -17.99%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
SJM vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SJM The J. M. Smucker Company | 21.63% | -7.56% | -9.61% | -17.79% | 20.06% | 21.05% | 14.50% | 14.90% | -22.58% | -0.49% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between SJM and KMB is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 1994 | 0.34 |
The correlation between SJM and KMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SJM:
$12.43B
KMB:
$34.08B
SJM:
-$1.30
KMB:
$5.93
SJM:
1.37
KMB:
2.06
SJM:
2.24
KMB:
18.98
SJM:
$9.05B
KMB:
$16.54B
SJM:
$3.03B
KMB:
$5.93B
SJM:
$360.20M
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SJM vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
SJM
KMB
SJM vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SJM | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.87 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | -0.67 | +1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.64 | -1.03 | +3.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SJM vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SJM drawdown since its inception was -45.67%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJM and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SJM | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.67% | -36.97% | -8.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.82% | -29.60% | +6.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.16% | -34.06% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.11% | -34.06% | -4.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.11% | -34.06% | -4.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.58% | -26.52% | +7.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.48% | -8.85% | -4.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.36% | 19.43% | -10.07% |
Volatility
SJM vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) has a higher volatility of 12.38% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 8.42%. This indicates that SJM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SJM | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.38% | 8.42% | +3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.78% | 16.67% | +4.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.74% | 25.77% | +1.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.31% | 20.19% | +4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.46% | 21.07% | +3.39% |
Dividends
SJM vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
SJM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than KMB's 4.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
SJM The J. M. Smucker Company | 3.78% | 4.46% | 3.89% | 3.29% | 2.54% | 2.78% | 3.08% | 3.32% | 3.49% | 2.46% | 2.22% | 2.12% |
Financials
SJM vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The J. M. Smucker Company and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SJM vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
SJM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The J. M. Smucker Company reported a gross profit of 941.10M and revenue of 2.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.5%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
SJM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The J. M. Smucker Company reported an operating income of -542.70M and revenue of 2.27B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.9%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
SJM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The J. M. Smucker Company reported a net income of 388.10M and revenue of 2.27B, resulting in a net margin of 17.1%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SJM and KMB have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SJM has higher volatility (12.38%) compared to KMB (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJM dropped -45.67% vs KMB's -36.97%.
SJM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SJM and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer