SIXH vs. QRFT
SIXH (6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF) and QRFT (QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXH is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while QRFT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SIXH returned 9.52%/yr vs 10.62%/yr for QRFT. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SIXH charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for QRFT.
Performance
SIXH vs. QRFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SIXH having a 11.60% return and QRFT slightly higher at 11.89%.
SIXH
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 6.10%
- YTD
- 11.60%
- 1Y
- 15.22%
- 3Y*
- 13.11%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.19%
QRFT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- YTD
- 11.89%
- 1Y
- 22.68%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.12M | $598.10K | $292.56K | |
| $1.56M | $1.08M | $613.75K |
SIXH vs. QRFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXH 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF | 11.60% | 9.47% | 12.06% | 4.93% | 6.90% | 18.37% | 6.49% |
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF | 11.89% | 17.95% | 21.36% | 24.16% | -22.69% | 22.74% | 40.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXH and QRFT is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SIXH and QRFT has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXH vs. QRFT — Risk / Return Rank
SIXH
QRFT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SIXH vs. QRFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIXH | QRFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.27 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 2.32 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.88 | 9.58 | -0.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIXH vs. QRFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXH drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, smaller than the maximum QRFT drawdown of -30.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXH and QRFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXH | QRFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.68% | -30.19% | +18.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.36% | -9.12% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.10% | -19.99% | +10.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.68% | -28.20% | +16.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -0.97% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -6.70% | +4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 2.21% | -0.49% |
Volatility
SIXH vs. QRFT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) is 2.40%, while QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that SIXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QRFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXH | QRFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.40% | 2.99% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.23% | 10.98% | -4.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.89% | 14.06% | -6.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.39% | 17.47% | -7.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.09% | 20.04% | -9.95% |
SIXH vs. QRFT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXH has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than QRFT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXH vs. QRFT - Dividend Comparison
SIXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, while QRFT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.27% | 0.27% | 0.52% | 0.77% | 0.83% | 0.05% | 1.81% | 4.00% |
SIXH 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF | 1.83% | 2.23% | 1.55% | 2.04% | 2.06% | 1.65% | 1.10% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXH and QRFT have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QRFT has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to SIXH (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXH dropped -11.68% vs QRFT's -30.19%.
On 5-year performance, QRFT leads with 10.62% vs 9.52% for SIXH. On fees, QRFT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QRFT has performed better with a 10.62% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QRFT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.
SIXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.27% for QRFT.
SIXH is categorized as Equity Hedged, while QRFT is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SIXH and 0.75% for QRFT.
SIXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIXH and QRFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer