PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXH vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXH vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SIXH having a 11.82% return and QQQ slightly higher at 12.26%.


SIXH

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.25%
6M
6.67%
YTD
11.82%
1Y
15.44%
3Y*
13.19%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.24%

QQQ

1D
0.65%
1M
-3.45%
6M
10.89%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
14.23%
10Y*
20.44%
ALL TIME*
10.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$30.32B$28.40B$31.45B
$192.69K$438.81K$385.38K

SIXH vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
11.82%9.47%12.06%4.93%6.90%18.37%6.49%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
12.26%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%40.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXH and QQQ is -0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020

0.25

The correlation between SIXH and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXH vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SIXH
SIXH Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SIXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXH Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXH Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SIXH vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIXHQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.21

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

1.88

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.12

6.00

+3.12

SIXH vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXH Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXH and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIXH vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXH drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXH and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXHQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.68%

-82.97%

+71.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.36%

-11.96%

+7.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.10%

-22.77%

+13.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.68%

-35.12%

+23.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

-7.69%

+6.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.82%

-32.62%

+30.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

3.74%

-2.03%

Volatility

SIXH vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) is 2.48%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that SIXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXHQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

6.87%

-4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.36%

16.08%

-9.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.87%

19.38%

-11.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.40%

22.90%

-12.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.09%

22.50%

-12.41%

SIXH vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXH has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXH vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

SIXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than QQQ's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.44%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
1.82%2.23%1.55%2.04%2.06%1.65%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXH and QQQ have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to SIXH (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXH dropped -11.68% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 14.23% vs 9.67% for SIXH. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 14.23% return vs 9.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.

SIXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.44% for QQQ.

SIXH is categorized as Equity Hedged, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SIXH and 0.18% for QQQ.

SIXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXH and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer