PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXH vs. LSAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXH vs. LSAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SIXH having a 9.61% return and LSAT slightly higher at 9.79%.


SIXH

1D
0.55%
1M
0.87%
YTD
9.61%
6M
9.61%
1Y
13.50%
3Y*
13.19%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*

LSAT

1D
-0.23%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
9.79%
6M
8.01%
1Y
10.52%
3Y*
11.86%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXH vs. LSAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
9.61%9.47%12.06%4.93%6.90%18.37%3.14%
LSAT
Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF
9.79%-1.54%18.16%13.64%-12.99%25.10%18.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXH and LSAT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2020

0.50

The correlation between SIXH and LSAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXH vs. LSAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXH
SIXH Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SIXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXH Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXH Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

LSAT
LSAT Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
LSAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
LSAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXH vs. LSAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIXHLSATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.14

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

1.33

+1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.88

3.12

+4.76

SIXH vs. LSAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXH Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the LSAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXH and LSAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIXH vs. LSAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXH drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, smaller than the maximum LSAT drawdown of -20.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXH and LSAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXHLSATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.68%

-20.48%

+8.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.36%

-7.94%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.10%

-18.25%

+9.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.68%

-20.48%

+8.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-1.96%

+1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.84%

-5.51%

+3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

3.38%

-1.66%

Volatility

SIXH vs. LSAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) is 2.33%, while Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that SIXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXHLSATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

3.34%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.07%

9.37%

-3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.68%

12.91%

-5.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.37%

16.25%

-5.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.13%

16.75%

-6.62%

SIXH vs. LSAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXH has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than LSAT's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXH vs. LSAT - Dividend Comparison

SIXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than LSAT's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
LSAT
Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF
1.73%1.90%1.31%1.85%0.36%3.44%0.30%
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
1.85%2.23%1.55%2.04%2.06%1.65%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXH and LSAT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSAT has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to SIXH (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXH dropped -11.68% vs LSAT's -20.48%.

On 5-year performance, SIXH leads with 9.64% vs 6.45% for LSAT. On fees, SIXH is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SIXH has performed better with a 9.64% return vs 6.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SIXH is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LSAT.

SIXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 1.73% for LSAT.

SIXH is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while LSAT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Redwood. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SIXH and 0.99% for LSAT.

SIXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXH and LSAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer