SIXH vs. LGLV
SIXH (6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF) and LGLV (SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds. SIXH is actively managed, while LGLV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SIXH returned 8.95%/yr vs 7.70%/yr for LGLV. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIXH charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for LGLV.
Performance
SIXH vs. LGLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXH achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly higher than LGLV's 0.83% return.
SIXH
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 7.20%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- 1Y
- 10.61%
- 3Y*
- 12.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- —
LGLV
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 2.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.70%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
SIXH vs. LGLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXH 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF | 7.20% | 9.47% | 12.06% | 4.93% | 6.90% | 18.37% | 5.83% |
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 0.83% | 8.37% | 16.22% | 9.19% | -8.17% | 27.95% | 23.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXH and LGLV is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020 | 0.61 |
The correlation between SIXH and LGLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
SIXH vs. LGLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIXH
LGLV
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
SIXH
LGLV
Technology
SIXH
LGLV
Communication Services
SIXH
LGLV
Healthcare
SIXH
LGLV
Financial Services
SIXH
LGLV
Industrials
SIXH
LGLV
Consumer Cyclical
SIXH
LGLV
Utilities
SIXH
LGLV
Real Estate
SIXH
LGLV
Energy
SIXH
LGLV
Basic Materials
SIXH
LGLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXH vs. LGLV — Risk / Return Rank
SIXH
LGLV
SIXH vs. LGLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIXH | LGLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.06 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 0.42 | +2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.25 | 1.08 | +5.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXH | LGLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 0.31 | +1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.60 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.76 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
SIXH vs. LGLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXH drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, smaller than the maximum LGLV drawdown of -36.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXH and LGLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXH | LGLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.68% | -36.64% | +24.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.36% | -6.86% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.10% | -10.17% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.68% | -17.49% | +5.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -6.60% | +4.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -3.21% | +1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.70% | 2.67% | -0.97% |
Volatility
SIXH vs. LGLV - Volatility Comparison
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) have volatilities of 2.31% and 2.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXH | LGLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | 2.42% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.02% | 6.52% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.60% | 9.20% | -1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 12.91% | -2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.15% | 16.06% | -5.91% |
SIXH vs. LGLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXH has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than LGLV's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXH vs. LGLV - Dividend Comparison
SIXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than LGLV's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.04% | 1.94% | 1.93% | 2.03% | 1.95% | 1.65% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 2.09% | 4.39% | 2.54% | 2.97% |
SIXH 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF | 1.90% | 2.23% | 1.55% | 2.04% | 2.06% | 1.65% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXH and LGLV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LGLV has higher volatility (2.42%) compared to SIXH (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXH dropped -11.68% vs LGLV's -36.64%.
On 5-year performance, SIXH leads with 8.95% vs 7.70% for LGLV. On fees, LGLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SIXH has performed better with a 8.95% return vs 7.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LGLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.
LGLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.90% for SIXH.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SIXH and 0.12% for LGLV.
SIXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIXH and LGLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer