PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXH vs. LGLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXH vs. LGLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXH achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly higher than LGLV's 3.56% return.


SIXH

1D
-0.24%
1M
1.07%
YTD
9.84%
6M
9.57%
1Y
13.13%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*

LGLV

1D
0.75%
1M
0.38%
YTD
3.56%
6M
2.59%
1Y
5.62%
3Y*
11.82%
5Y*
8.26%
10Y*
11.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXH vs. LGLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
9.84%9.47%12.06%4.93%6.90%18.37%6.49%
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
3.56%8.37%16.22%9.19%-8.17%27.95%23.14%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXH and LGLV is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020

0.61

The correlation between SIXH and LGLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXH vs. LGLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXH
SIXH Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SIXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXH Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXH Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

LGLV
LGLV Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
LGLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
LGLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGLV Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXH vs. LGLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIXHLGLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.10

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

0.82

+2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.67

1.94

+5.73

SIXH vs. LGLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXH Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the LGLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXH and LGLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIXH vs. LGLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXH drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, smaller than the maximum LGLV drawdown of -36.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXH and LGLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXHLGLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.68%

-36.64%

+24.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.36%

-6.86%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.10%

-10.17%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.68%

-17.49%

+5.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-4.07%

+3.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.84%

-3.22%

+1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

2.91%

-1.19%

Volatility

SIXH vs. LGLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) is 2.30%, while SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) has a volatility of 3.55%. This indicates that SIXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXHLGLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

3.55%

-1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.08%

7.04%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.67%

9.53%

-1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.37%

12.94%

-2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.12%

16.07%

-5.95%

SIXH vs. LGLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXH has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than LGLV's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXH vs. LGLV - Dividend Comparison

SIXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than LGLV's 2.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.07%1.94%1.93%2.03%1.95%1.65%1.98%1.89%2.09%4.39%2.54%2.97%
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
1.85%2.23%1.55%2.04%2.06%1.65%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXH and LGLV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LGLV has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to SIXH (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXH dropped -11.68% vs LGLV's -36.64%.

On 5-year performance, SIXH leads with 9.57% vs 8.26% for LGLV. On fees, LGLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SIXH has performed better with a 9.57% return vs 8.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LGLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.

LGLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 1.85% for SIXH.

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SIXH and 0.12% for LGLV.

SIXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXH and LGLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer