LGLV vs. SCHD
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD).
LGLV and SCHD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LGLV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR). It was launched on Feb 20, 2013. SCHD is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011. Both LGLV and SCHD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LGLV or SCHD.
Key characteristics
LGLV | SCHD | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 21.56% | 17.75% |
1Y Return | 31.23% | 31.70% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 8.60% | 7.26% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 11.67% | 12.80% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 11.88% | 11.72% |
Sharpe Ratio | 3.39 | 2.67 |
Sortino Ratio | 4.72 | 3.84 |
Omega Ratio | 1.63 | 1.47 |
Calmar Ratio | 4.26 | 2.80 |
Martin Ratio | 21.06 | 14.83 |
Ulcer Index | 1.45% | 2.04% |
Daily Std Dev | 8.98% | 11.32% |
Max Drawdown | -36.64% | -33.37% |
Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGLV and SCHD is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LGLV vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LGLV achieves a 21.56% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 17.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LGLV having a 11.88% annualized return and SCHD not far behind at 11.72%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LGLV vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LGLV vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LGLV vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
LGLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than SCHD's 3.36% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 1.86% | 2.03% | 1.95% | 1.65% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 2.09% | 4.39% | 2.54% | 2.97% | 7.14% | 2.99% |
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF | 3.36% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% | 2.63% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
LGLV vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGLV drawdown since its inception was -36.64%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLV and SCHD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LGLV vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) is 2.95%, while Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that LGLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.