LGLV vs. SPTM
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM).
LGLV and SPTM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LGLV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR). It was launched on Feb 20, 2013. SPTM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Composite 1500 Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2000. Both LGLV and SPTM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LGLV or SPTM.
Correlation
The correlation between LGLV and SPTM is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LGLV vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LGLV:
1.82
SPTM:
2.11
LGLV:
2.50
SPTM:
2.82
LGLV:
1.32
SPTM:
1.39
LGLV:
2.42
SPTM:
3.15
LGLV:
9.78
SPTM:
13.60
LGLV:
1.70%
SPTM:
1.94%
LGLV:
9.12%
SPTM:
12.46%
LGLV:
-36.64%
SPTM:
-54.80%
LGLV:
-6.85%
SPTM:
-3.15%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGLV achieves a 15.73% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 24.36% return. Over the past 10 years, LGLV has underperformed SPTM with an annualized return of 11.05%, while SPTM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.73% annualized return.
LGLV
15.73%
-3.65%
8.36%
17.83%
9.80%
11.05%
SPTM
24.36%
-0.24%
8.64%
26.33%
14.33%
12.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LGLV vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LGLV vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LGLV vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
LGLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than SPTM's 0.93% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 1.34% | 2.03% | 1.95% | 1.65% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 2.09% | 4.39% | 2.54% | 2.97% | 7.14% | 2.99% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 0.93% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.71% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% | 2.08% | 1.63% |
Drawdowns
LGLV vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGLV drawdown since its inception was -36.64%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLV and SPTM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LGLV vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) is 3.03%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) has a volatility of 3.76%. This indicates that LGLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.