LGLV vs. FNDX
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX).
LGLV and FNDX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LGLV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR). It was launched on Feb 20, 2013. FNDX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both LGLV and FNDX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LGLV or FNDX.
Correlation
The correlation between LGLV and FNDX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LGLV vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LGLV:
1.82
FNDX:
1.62
LGLV:
2.50
FNDX:
2.26
LGLV:
1.32
FNDX:
1.30
LGLV:
2.42
FNDX:
2.83
LGLV:
9.78
FNDX:
10.07
LGLV:
1.70%
FNDX:
1.82%
LGLV:
9.12%
FNDX:
11.28%
LGLV:
-36.64%
FNDX:
-37.71%
LGLV:
-6.85%
FNDX:
-6.01%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGLV achieves a 15.73% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 17.96% return. Over the past 10 years, LGLV has underperformed FNDX with an annualized return of 11.05%, while FNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.
LGLV
15.73%
-3.65%
8.36%
17.83%
9.80%
11.05%
FNDX
17.96%
-3.24%
7.34%
20.04%
16.15%
14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LGLV vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LGLV vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LGLV vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
LGLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than FNDX's 2.64% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 1.34% | 2.03% | 1.95% | 1.65% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 2.09% | 4.39% | 2.54% | 2.97% | 7.14% | 2.99% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 2.64% | 1.82% | 4.20% | 1.68% | 3.38% | 4.64% | 2.40% | 5.60% | 2.90% | 4.02% | 3.36% | 0.46% |
Drawdowns
LGLV vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGLV drawdown since its inception was -36.64%, roughly equal to the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLV and FNDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LGLV vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) is 3.07%, while Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that LGLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.