PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGLV vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LGLV vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LGLV vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.00%8.37%16.22%9.19%-8.17%27.95%7.42%30.83%0.32%17.84%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
2.76%16.94%16.77%18.23%-6.92%31.73%9.12%28.65%-7.30%17.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGLV achieves a 2.00% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 2.76% return. Over the past 10 years, LGLV has underperformed FNDX with an annualized return of 11.24%, while FNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.26% annualized return.


LGLV

1D
1.10%
1M
-5.28%
YTD
2.00%
6M
1.06%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
11.46%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
11.24%

FNDX

1D
1.98%
1M
-3.68%
YTD
2.76%
6M
6.80%
1Y
19.99%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
13.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LGLV vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

LGLV vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGLV
LGLV Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
LGLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
LGLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGLV vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGLVFNDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.35

1.24

-0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.58

1.80

-1.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.28

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

1.73

-1.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.44

8.31

-5.87

LGLV vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGLV and FNDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGLVFNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

1.24

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.79

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.76

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.74

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between LGLV and FNDX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

LGLV vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

LGLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than FNDX's 1.62% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.02%1.94%1.93%2.03%1.95%1.65%1.98%1.89%2.09%4.39%2.54%2.97%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.62%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%

Drawdowns

LGLV vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGLV drawdown since its inception was -36.64%, roughly equal to the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLV and FNDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LGLVFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.64%

-37.72%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-12.25%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.49%

-19.06%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.64%

-37.72%

+1.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.52%

-4.21%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.19%

-3.59%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.55%

-0.25%

Volatility

LGLV vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) is 3.11%, while Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that LGLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LGLVFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

3.93%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.63%

8.05%

-1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

16.21%

-3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.93%

15.26%

-2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.10%

17.51%

-1.41%