SIXA vs. MGV
SIXA (6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF) and MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while MGV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. SIXA is actively managed, while MGV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SIXA returned 12.50%/yr vs 11.92%/yr for MGV. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SIXA charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGV.
Performance
SIXA vs. MGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXA achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 13.14% return.
SIXA
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 11.89%
- 6M
- 12.48%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- —
MGV
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- 13.14%
- 6M
- 13.88%
- 1Y
- 26.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.87%
- 5Y*
- 11.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
SIXA vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 11.89% | 15.52% | 22.70% | 11.98% | -5.72% | 23.87% | 18.45% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 13.14% | 15.45% | 16.94% | 9.16% | -1.22% | 25.93% | 23.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXA and MGV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between SIXA and MGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
SIXA vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIXA
MGV
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
SIXA
MGV
Technology
SIXA
MGV
Communication Services
SIXA
MGV
Healthcare
SIXA
MGV
Financial Services
SIXA
MGV
Industrials
SIXA
MGV
Consumer Cyclical
SIXA
MGV
Utilities
SIXA
MGV
Energy
SIXA
MGV
Real Estate
SIXA
MGV
Basic Materials
SIXA
-
MGV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXA vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank
SIXA
MGV
SIXA vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIXA | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.50 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 4.22 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.75 | 16.07 | -3.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXA | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.76 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.88 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.20 | 0.48 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
SIXA vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXA drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -55.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXA and MGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXA | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -55.87% | +37.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.59% | -6.42% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.22% | -13.18% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.38% | -16.54% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | 0.00% | -0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.00% | -7.70% | +4.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 1.68% | -0.21% |
Volatility
SIXA vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison
6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) have volatilities of 2.56% and 2.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXA | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | 2.46% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.76% | 7.46% | -0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.94% | 9.83% | -0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.80% | 13.56% | -0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.36% | 16.33% | -2.97% |
SIXA vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXA has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXA vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison
SIXA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, more than MGV's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 1.88% | 2.04% | 2.31% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% |
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 2.01% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 2.12% | 2.23% | 1.63% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXA and MGV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIXA has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to MGV (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXA dropped -18.38% vs MGV's -55.87%.
On 5-year performance, SIXA leads with 12.50% vs 11.92% for MGV. On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SIXA has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 11.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for SIXA.
SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 1.88% for MGV.
SIXA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MGV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for SIXA and 0.05% for MGV.
MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIXA and MGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer