SIVR vs. GLTR
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR).
SIVR and GLTR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIVR is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). It was launched on Jul 24, 2009. GLTR is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2010. Both SIVR and GLTR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SIVR vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SIVR vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF | 5.81% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -8.96% | 5.97% |
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 7.45% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 20.96% | -2.85% | 12.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than GLTR's 7.45% return. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has outperformed GLTR with an annualized return of 17.10%, while GLTR has yielded a comparatively lower 14.22% annualized return.
SIVR
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -16.47%
- YTD
- 5.81%
- 6M
- 58.90%
- 1Y
- 123.03%
- 3Y*
- 45.76%
- 5Y*
- 24.34%
- 10Y*
- 17.10%
GLTR
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -13.18%
- YTD
- 7.45%
- 6M
- 32.87%
- 1Y
- 71.49%
- 3Y*
- 34.29%
- 5Y*
- 18.60%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIVR vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
GLTR
SIVR vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIVR | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.17 | 1.94 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.24 | 2.17 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.37 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 2.38 | +0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.74 | 8.16 | +0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIVR | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 1.94 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.81 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.70 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.35 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and GLTR is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SIVR vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIVR nor GLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than GLTR's maximum drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and GLTR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -55.70% | -20.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.42% | -29.70% | -12.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.42% | -29.70% | -12.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.42% | -29.70% | -12.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.45% | -22.55% | -12.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.99% | -28.89% | -19.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.75% | 8.65% | +5.10% |
Volatility
SIVR vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 16.98% compared to Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) at 12.22%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.98% | 12.22% | +4.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.26% | 35.76% | +21.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.02% | 37.11% | +19.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.30% | 23.15% | +12.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.39% | 20.27% | +11.12% |