SIVR vs. GGP.L
SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while GGP.L (Greatland Gold plc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SIVR returned 11.29%/yr vs 59.55%/yr for GGP.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SIVR vs. GGP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SIVR is traded in USD, while GGP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GGP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -16.88% return, which is significantly lower than GGP.L's 15.09% return. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has underperformed GGP.L with an annualized return of 11.29%, while GGP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 59.55% annualized return.
SIVR
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -21.69%
- YTD
- -16.88%
- 6M
- -22.35%
- 1Y
- 63.38%
- 3Y*
- 37.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.29%
GGP.L
- 1D
- -3.79%
- 1M
- -18.10%
- YTD
- 15.09%
- 6M
- 14.82%
- 1Y
- 78.16%
- 3Y*
- 64.07%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 59.55%
SIVR vs. GGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -16.88% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -8.96% | 5.97% |
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc | 15.09% | 340.75% | -36.57% | 29.75% | -55.34% | -57.03% | 2,012.80% | 3.44% | -8.69% | 1,104.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and GGP.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2009 | 0.13 |
Over the past year, SIVR and GGP.L have become more correlated (0.42) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. GGP.L — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
GGP.L
SIVR vs. GGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIVR | GGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 2.43 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.77 | 5.83 | -3.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. GGP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, smaller than the maximum GGP.L drawdown of -98.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and GGP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | GGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -98.61% | +22.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.92% | -31.98% | -18.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.92% | -54.95% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.92% | -77.84% | +26.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.92% | -87.05% | +36.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.29% | -25.05% | -24.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.83% | -67.59% | +19.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.98% | 13.36% | +9.62% |
Volatility
SIVR vs. GGP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) is 15.69%, while Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) has a volatility of 20.50%. This indicates that SIVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | GGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.69% | 20.50% | -4.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.87% | 45.46% | +13.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.71% | 65.33% | -4.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.77% | 66.63% | -29.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.16% | 91.82% | -59.66% |
Dividends
SIVR vs. GGP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIVR nor GGP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SIVR and GGP.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SIVR and GGP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer