PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIOO vs. ATMP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIOO vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIOO achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly lower than ATMP's 22.14% return.


SIOO

1D
0.28%
1M
2.51%
6M
6.82%
YTD
7.33%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ATMP

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.28%
6M
21.51%
YTD
22.14%
1Y
21.72%
3Y*
20.35%
5Y*
16.24%
10Y*
4.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIOO vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SIOO and ATMP is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

-0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIOO vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIOO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ATMP
ATMP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ATMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATMP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ATMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATMP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIOO vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIOOATMPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.29

SIOO vs. ATMP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIOO vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIOO drawdown since its inception was -6.86%, smaller than the maximum ATMP drawdown of -80.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIOO and ATMP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIOOATMPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.86%

-80.86%

+74.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.41%

+4.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.06%

-30.94%

+29.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

Volatility

SIOO vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIOOATMPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52%

14.50%

-3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.52%

22.11%

-11.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.52%

27.64%

-17.12%

SIOO vs. ATMP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIOO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ATMP's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIOO vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison

SIOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.69%, while ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


SIOO and ATMP have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SIOO is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SIOO is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ATMP.

SIOO has the higher dividend yield at 8.69%, compared with 0.00% for ATMP.

SIOO is categorized as Derivative Income, while ATMP is MLPs. SIOO tracks S&P 100, while ATMP tracks CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Barclays Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SIOO and 0.95% for ATMP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIOO and ATMP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer