SIOO vs. ATMP
SIOO (VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF) and ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - SIOO is a Derivative Income fund tracking the S&P 100, while ATMP is a MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. SIOO charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ATMP.
Performance
SIOO vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIOO achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly lower than ATMP's 22.14% return.
SIOO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- 6M
- 6.82%
- YTD
- 7.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATMP
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 21.51%
- YTD
- 22.14%
- 1Y
- 21.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.35%
- 5Y*
- 16.24%
- 10Y*
- 4.46%
SIOO vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SIOO VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF | 7.33% | 1.16% |
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 22.14% | 0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIOO and ATMP is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIOO vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank
SIOO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ATMP
SIOO vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIOO | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.68 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIOO vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIOO drawdown since its inception was -6.86%, smaller than the maximum ATMP drawdown of -80.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIOO and ATMP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIOO | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -80.86% | +74.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.41% | +4.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.06% | -30.94% | +29.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.52% | — |
Volatility
SIOO vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIOO | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 14.50% | -3.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.52% | 22.11% | -11.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.52% | 27.64% | -17.12% |
SIOO vs. ATMP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIOO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ATMP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIOO vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison
SIOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.69%, while ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIOO VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF | 8.69% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIOO and ATMP have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SIOO is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SIOO is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ATMP.
SIOO has the higher dividend yield at 8.69%, compared with 0.00% for ATMP.
SIOO is categorized as Derivative Income, while ATMP is MLPs. SIOO tracks S&P 100, while ATMP tracks CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Barclays Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SIOO and 0.95% for ATMP.
Find the right allocation for SIOO and ATMP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer