SILJ vs. PXJ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) and PXJ (Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while PXJ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SILJ returned 10.08%/yr vs -0.80%/yr for PXJ. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SILJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for PXJ.

Performance

SILJ vs. PXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly lower than PXJ's 46.18% return. Over the past 10 years, SILJ has outperformed PXJ with an annualized return of 10.08%, while PXJ has yielded a comparatively lower -0.80% annualized return.

SILJ

• 1D: -5.24%
• 1M: 2.57%
• YTD: 6.61%
• 6M: 16.40%
• 1Y: 111.95%
• 3Y*: 47.77%
• 5Y*: 13.13%
• 10Y*: 10.08%

PXJ

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -6.26%
• YTD: 46.18%
• 6M: 38.54%
• 1Y: 82.76%
• 3Y*: 24.79%
• 5Y*: 17.27%
• 10Y*: -0.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SILJ vs. PXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	6.61%	183.89%	6.39%	-5.21%	-15.42%	-23.21%	33.00%	57.06%	-27.95%	-5.65%
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	46.18%	8.74%	0.21%	14.44%	62.25%	11.28%	-44.31%	-0.32%	-39.82%	-23.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SILJ and PXJ is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012	0.26

The correlation between SILJ and PXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SILJ vs. PXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SILJ	PXJ
Basic Materials	99.8%	-
Financial Services	0.3%	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	0.2%	-
Communication Services	0.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Energy	-	92.6%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	5.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

SILJ vs. PXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SILJ

SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 54
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 47

PXJ

PXJ Risk / Return Rank: 89
PXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 80
PXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SILJ vs. PXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SILJ	PXJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	3.17	-1.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	3.92	-1.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.48	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	8.24	-5.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.99	23.98	-15.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SILJ vs. PXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SILJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is lower than the PXJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SILJ and PXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SILJ	PXJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05	3.17	-1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	0.50	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	-0.02	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	-0.05	+0.13

Drawdowns

SILJ vs. PXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, smaller than the maximum PXJ drawdown of -94.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and PXJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SILJ	PXJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.04%	-94.82%	+15.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.71%	-10.10%	-24.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.71%	-40.03%	+5.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.47%	-40.03%	-15.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.06%	-87.72%	+17.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.80%	-66.60%	+39.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.43%	-55.67%	+14.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.06%	3.46%	+10.60%

Volatility

SILJ vs. PXJ - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a higher volatility of 18.69% compared to Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) at 7.75%. This indicates that SILJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SILJ	PXJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.69%	7.75%	+10.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.24%	18.30%	+26.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.90%	26.41%	+28.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.35%	34.57%	+9.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.24%	39.47%	+6.77%

SILJ vs. PXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than PXJ's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

SILJ vs. PXJ - Dividend Comparison

SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than PXJ's 2.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	2.21%	2.91%	3.34%	1.99%	0.65%	2.40%	4.72%	1.87%	0.99%	2.75%	1.18%	2.36%
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	1.88%	2.00%	7.26%	0.01%	0.05%	0.36%	1.23%	1.45%	1.66%	0.00%	0.52%	2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SILJ and PXJ in my portfolio?

SILJ and PXJ have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SILJ or PXJ?

SILJ has higher volatility (18.69%) compared to PXJ (7.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SILJ dropped -79.04% vs PXJ's -94.82%.

Which ETF is better, SILJ or PXJ?

On 10-year performance, SILJ leads with 10.08% vs -0.80% for PXJ. On fees, PXJ is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, PXJ has been the lower-risk option at 7.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SILJ or PXJ?

Over the 10-year period, SILJ has performed better with a 10.08% return vs -0.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SILJ or PXJ?

PXJ is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SILJ or PXJ?

PXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 1.88% for SILJ.

What is the main difference between SILJ and PXJ?

SILJ is categorized as Silver, while PXJ is Energy Equities. SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while PXJ tracks Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SILJ and 0.63% for PXJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.