PXJ vs. XES

In the year-to-date period, PXJ achieves a -18.90% return, which is significantly higher than XES's -24.63% return. Over the past 10 years, PXJ has outperformed XES with an annualized return of -11.33%, while XES has yielded a comparatively lower -13.81% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PXJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than XES's 0.35% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PXJ Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is comparable to the XES Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXJ and XES, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than XES's 1.98% yield.

The maximum PXJ drawdown since its inception was -94.88%, roughly equal to the maximum XES drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXJ and XES. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) is 21.36%, while SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) has a volatility of 23.93%. This indicates that PXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.