PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXJ vs. XES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXJ vs. XES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXJ achieves a 42.12% return, which is significantly higher than XES's 39.22% return. Over the past 10 years, PXJ has outperformed XES with an annualized return of -1.36%, while XES has yielded a comparatively lower -3.65% annualized return.


PXJ

1D
0.11%
1M
-8.62%
YTD
42.12%
6M
42.80%
1Y
74.07%
3Y*
24.32%
5Y*
17.58%
10Y*
-1.36%

XES

1D
-1.07%
1M
-12.19%
YTD
39.22%
6M
40.00%
1Y
79.49%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
12.58%
10Y*
-3.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXJ vs. XES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXJ
Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF
42.12%8.74%0.21%14.44%62.25%11.28%-44.31%-0.32%-39.82%-23.08%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
39.22%5.89%-5.44%6.68%62.03%12.00%-43.38%-9.00%-46.99%-21.93%

Correlation

The correlation between PXJ and XES is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.97

The correlation between PXJ and XES has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

PXJ vs. XES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXJ
XES

Energy

93.9%
97.1%

Industrials

5.9%
2.9%

Utilities

2.1%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

PXJ
93.9%
XES
97.1%

Industrials

PXJ
5.9%
XES
2.9%

Utilities

PXJ
2.1%
XES

-

Financial Services

PXJ
0.2%
XES

-

Basic Materials

PXJ

-

XES

-

Communication Services

PXJ

-

XES

-

Consumer Cyclical

PXJ

-

XES

-

Consumer Defensive

PXJ

-

XES

-

Healthcare

PXJ

-

XES

-

Real Estate

PXJ

-

XES

-

Technology

PXJ

-

XES

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXJ vs. XES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXJ
PXJ Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

XES
XES Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXJ vs. XES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXJXESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.40

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.79

5.32

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.22

18.76

+0.46

PXJ vs. XES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the XES Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXJ and XES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXJ vs. XES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXJ drawdown since its inception was -94.82%, roughly equal to the maximum XES drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXJ and XES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXJXESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.82%

-95.65%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-15.03%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.03%

-45.95%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.03%

-45.95%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.72%

-91.23%

+3.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.53%

-73.11%

+5.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.69%

-54.40%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

4.25%

-0.38%

Volatility

PXJ vs. XES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) is 8.62%, while SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) has a volatility of 10.30%. This indicates that PXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXJXESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.62%

10.30%

-1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.50%

20.80%

-2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.77%

31.19%

-4.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.48%

39.02%

-4.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.34%

44.96%

-5.62%

PXJ vs. XES - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than XES's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXJ vs. XES - Dividend Comparison

PXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than XES's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXJ
Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF
2.46%2.91%3.34%1.99%0.65%2.40%4.72%1.87%0.99%2.75%1.18%2.36%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
1.15%1.69%1.31%0.66%0.36%1.81%1.33%1.43%1.14%1.68%0.64%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, PXJ and XES move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XES has higher volatility (10.30%) compared to PXJ (8.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXJ dropped -94.82% vs XES's -95.65%.

On 10-year performance, PXJ leads with -1.36% vs -3.65% for XES. On fees, XES is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PXJ has been the lower-risk option at 8.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PXJ has performed better with a -1.36% return vs -3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XES is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PXJ.

PXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 1.15% for XES.

PXJ tracks Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index, while XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PXJ and 0.35% for XES.

PXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXJ and XES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer