PXJ vs. NANR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

PXJ (Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF) and NANR (SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXJ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index, while NANR is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXJ returned -0.74%/yr vs 12.58%/yr for NANR. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PXJ charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NANR.

Performance

PXJ vs. NANR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXJ achieves a 47.03% return, which is significantly higher than NANR's 24.74% return. Over the past 10 years, PXJ has underperformed NANR with an annualized return of -0.74%, while NANR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.58% annualized return.

PXJ

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: -5.54%
• YTD: 47.03%
• 6M: 44.84%
• 1Y: 89.31%
• 3Y*: 25.03%
• 5Y*: 17.57%
• 10Y*: -0.74%

NANR

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: 2.67%
• YTD: 24.74%
• 6M: 28.76%
• 1Y: 55.64%
• 3Y*: 21.02%
• 5Y*: 16.60%
• 10Y*: 12.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXJ vs. NANR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	47.03%	8.74%	0.21%	14.44%	62.25%	11.28%	-44.31%	-0.32%	-39.82%	-23.08%
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF	24.74%	35.35%	2.31%	-3.23%	26.49%	36.43%	1.03%	18.99%	-16.77%	8.03%

Correlation

The correlation between PXJ and NANR is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2015	0.75

The correlation between PXJ and NANR shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PXJ vs. NANR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PXJ	NANR
Energy	92.6%	41.1%
Industrials	5.2%	0.0%
Utilities	2.1%	0.0%
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	47.1%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	5.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.4%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	0.4%
Technology	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

PXJ vs. NANR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXJ

PXJ Risk / Return Rank: 91
PXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
PXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
PXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 84
PXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 94

NANR

NANR Risk / Return Rank: 88
NANR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
NANR Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
NANR Omega Ratio Rank: 83
NANR Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
NANR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXJ vs. NANR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PXJ	NANR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.40	3.09	+0.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.14	3.82	+0.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.51	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.00	6.64	+2.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	26.58	23.52	+3.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PXJ vs. NANR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXJ Sharpe Ratio is 3.40, which is comparable to the NANR Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXJ and NANR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PXJ	NANR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.40	3.09	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.73	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.02	0.54	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.63	-0.68

Drawdowns

PXJ vs. NANR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXJ drawdown since its inception was -94.82%, which is greater than NANR's maximum drawdown of -49.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXJ and NANR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PXJ	NANR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.82%	-49.15%	-45.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.10%	-8.93%	-1.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.03%	-18.42%	-21.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.03%	-26.42%	-13.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.72%	-49.15%	-38.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.40%	-1.82%	-64.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.67%	-8.40%	-47.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.42%	2.52%	+0.90%

Volatility

PXJ vs. NANR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) has a higher volatility of 7.76% compared to SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) at 4.89%. This indicates that PXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NANR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PXJ	NANR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.76%	4.89%	+2.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.28%	14.36%	+3.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.40%	18.25%	+8.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.57%	22.89%	+11.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.48%	23.54%	+15.94%

PXJ vs. NANR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than NANR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PXJ vs. NANR - Dividend Comparison

PXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than NANR's 1.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF	1.68%	1.77%	2.20%	2.78%	2.70%	2.61%	2.73%	2.02%	1.95%	1.83%	5.01%	0.01%
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	2.19%	2.91%	3.34%	1.99%	0.65%	2.40%	4.72%	1.87%	0.99%	2.75%	1.18%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PXJ and NANR in my portfolio?

PXJ and NANR have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PXJ or NANR?

PXJ has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to NANR (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXJ dropped -94.82% vs NANR's -49.15%.

Which ETF is better, PXJ or NANR?

On 10-year performance, NANR leads with 12.58% vs -0.74% for PXJ. On fees, NANR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NANR has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PXJ or NANR?

Over the 10-year period, NANR has performed better with a 12.58% return vs -0.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PXJ or NANR?

NANR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PXJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PXJ or NANR?

PXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.68% for NANR.

What is the main difference between PXJ and NANR?

PXJ is categorized as Energy Equities, while NANR is Commodity Producers Equities. PXJ tracks Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index, while NANR tracks S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PXJ and 0.35% for NANR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 3.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.