PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXJ vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXJ vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXJ achieves a 47.03% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, PXJ has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of -0.74%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


PXJ

1D
1.35%
1M
-5.54%
YTD
47.03%
6M
44.84%
1Y
89.31%
3Y*
25.03%
5Y*
17.57%
10Y*
-0.74%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXJ vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXJ
Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF
47.03%8.74%0.21%14.44%62.25%11.28%-44.31%-0.32%-39.82%-23.08%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PXJ and VOO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between PXJ and VOO has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PXJ vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXJ
VOO

Energy

92.6%
3.5%

Industrials

5.2%
8.3%

Utilities

2.1%
2.4%

Financial Services

0.1%
11.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.7%

Energy

PXJ
92.6%
VOO
3.5%

Industrials

PXJ
5.2%
VOO
8.3%

Utilities

PXJ
2.1%
VOO
2.4%

Financial Services

PXJ
0.1%
VOO
11.6%

Basic Materials

PXJ

-

VOO
1.8%

Communication Services

PXJ

-

VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PXJ

-

VOO
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

PXJ

-

VOO
4.9%

Healthcare

PXJ

-

VOO
8.5%

Real Estate

PXJ

-

VOO
1.9%

Technology

PXJ

-

VOO
35.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXJ vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXJ
PXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXJ vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXJVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.40

2.53

+0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.14

3.43

+0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.46

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.00

3.42

+5.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

26.58

15.95

+10.63

PXJ vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXJ Sharpe Ratio is 3.40, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXJ and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXJVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.40

2.53

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.85

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

0.87

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.89

-0.93

Drawdowns

PXJ vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXJ drawdown since its inception was -94.82%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXJ and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXJVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.82%

-33.99%

-60.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

-8.90%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.03%

-18.69%

-21.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.03%

-24.52%

-15.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.72%

-33.99%

-53.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.40%

0.00%

-66.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.67%

-3.69%

-51.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

1.91%

+1.51%

Volatility

PXJ vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) has a higher volatility of 7.76% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that PXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXJVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

2.74%

+5.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.28%

8.88%

+9.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.40%

11.78%

+14.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.57%

16.81%

+17.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.48%

18.01%

+21.47%

PXJ vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXJ vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

PXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXJ
Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF
2.19%2.91%3.34%1.99%0.65%2.40%4.72%1.87%0.99%2.75%1.18%2.36%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXJ and VOO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXJ has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXJ dropped -94.82% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.65% vs -0.74% for PXJ. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.65% return vs -0.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PXJ.

PXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

PXJ is categorized as Energy Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. PXJ tracks Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PXJ and 0.03% for VOO.

PXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXJ and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer