PXJ vs. NLR
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR).
PXJ and NLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PXJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index. It was launched on Oct 26, 2005. NLR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the DAXglobal Nuclear Energy Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2007. Both PXJ and NLR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PXJ or NLR.
Correlation
The correlation between PXJ and NLR is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PXJ vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PXJ:
0.58
NLR:
0.57
PXJ:
0.94
NLR:
1.01
PXJ:
1.11
NLR:
1.12
PXJ:
0.18
NLR:
0.74
PXJ:
1.54
NLR:
1.76
PXJ:
9.47%
NLR:
8.98%
PXJ:
25.23%
NLR:
27.93%
PXJ:
-94.88%
NLR:
-66.96%
PXJ:
-77.28%
NLR:
-9.06%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXJ achieves a 9.40% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's 7.28% return. Over the past 10 years, PXJ has underperformed NLR with an annualized return of -7.09%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively higher 8.89% annualized return.
PXJ
9.40%
14.49%
-4.80%
13.43%
6.14%
-7.09%
NLR
7.28%
7.37%
11.08%
14.86%
14.61%
8.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PXJ vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than NLR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PXJ vs. NLR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PXJ
NLR
PXJ vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PXJ vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
PXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than NLR's 0.70% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF | 3.05% | 3.33% | 2.00% | 0.66% | 2.38% | 4.73% | 0.39% | 1.02% | 2.76% | 1.19% | 2.36% | 1.12% |
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 0.70% | 0.75% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.43% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% | 2.48% |
Drawdowns
PXJ vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXJ drawdown since its inception was -94.88%, which is greater than NLR's maximum drawdown of -66.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXJ and NLR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PXJ vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) is 6.18%, while VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 8.83%. This indicates that PXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.