SHW vs. LPG
SHW (The Sherwin-Williams Company) and LPG (Dorian LPG Ltd.) are both stocks. SHW operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while LPG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, SHW returned 13.58%/yr vs 29.41%/yr for LPG. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SHW vs. LPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHW achieves a -1.61% return, which is significantly lower than LPG's 94.53% return. Over the past 10 years, SHW has underperformed LPG with an annualized return of 13.58%, while LPG has yielded a comparatively higher 29.41% annualized return.
SHW
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- -1.61%
- 6M
- -3.00%
- 1Y
- -10.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
LPG
- 1D
- 3.79%
- 1M
- 14.01%
- YTD
- 94.53%
- 6M
- 93.10%
- 1Y
- 108.89%
- 3Y*
- 37.14%
- 5Y*
- 47.82%
- 10Y*
- 29.41%
SHW vs. LPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | -1.61% | -3.83% | 9.90% | 32.73% | -31.96% | 44.90% | 27.05% | 49.70% | -3.23% | 54.11% |
LPG Dorian LPG Ltd. | 94.53% | 9.75% | -37.80% | 171.42% | 109.62% | 12.71% | -21.25% | 165.52% | -29.08% | 0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHW and LPG is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2014 | 0.14 |
The correlation between SHW and LPG shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SHW:
$78.72B
LPG:
$1.93B
SHW:
$10.42
LPG:
$4.54
SHW:
30.45
LPG:
9.95
SHW:
2.96
LPG:
0.15
SHW:
3.31
LPG:
4.00
SHW:
17.77
LPG:
1.69
SHW:
$23.94B
LPG:
$481.51M
SHW:
$11.76B
LPG:
$415.02M
SHW:
$4.29B
LPG:
$279.22M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHW vs. LPG — Risk / Return Rank
SHW
LPG
SHW vs. LPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) and Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHW | LPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.42 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 4.38 | -4.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 9.39 | -10.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHW vs. LPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHW drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, smaller than the maximum LPG drawdown of -78.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHW and LPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHW | LPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.02% | -78.31% | +26.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.36% | -24.99% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.69% | -62.89% | +37.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.46% | -62.89% | +20.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.46% | -62.89% | +20.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.53% | -5.30% | -14.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -42.68% | +31.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.28% | 11.64% | -1.36% |
Volatility
SHW vs. LPG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is 9.00%, while Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG) has a volatility of 17.04%. This indicates that SHW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHW | LPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 17.04% | -8.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.26% | 30.44% | -11.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.46% | 39.81% | -14.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.27% | 43.43% | -17.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.58% | 48.29% | -21.71% |
Dividends
SHW vs. LPG - Dividend Comparison
SHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than LPG's 6.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPG Dorian LPG Ltd. | 6.53% | 10.07% | 16.41% | 9.12% | 29.02% | 7.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | 1.00% | 0.98% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 0.87% | 0.83% | 1.25% | 1.03% |
Financials
SHW vs. LPG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Sherwin-Williams Company and Dorian LPG Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SHW and LPG have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LPG has higher volatility (17.04%) compared to SHW (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHW dropped -52.02% vs LPG's -78.31%.
LPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHW and LPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer