PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LPG vs. GSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LPG vs. GSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG) and Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LPG achieves a 74.77% return, which is significantly higher than GSL's 14.96% return. Over the past 10 years, LPG has outperformed GSL with an annualized return of 29.54%, while GSL has yielded a comparatively lower 18.22% annualized return.


LPG

1D
1.53%
1M
-12.61%
YTD
74.77%
6M
77.39%
1Y
78.27%
3Y*
32.37%
5Y*
44.64%
10Y*
29.54%

GSL

1D
1.88%
1M
2.68%
YTD
14.96%
6M
16.76%
1Y
62.79%
3Y*
37.22%
5Y*
21.44%
10Y*
18.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LPG vs. GSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LPG
Dorian LPG Ltd.
74.77%9.75%-37.80%171.42%109.62%12.71%-21.25%165.52%-29.08%0.12%
GSL
Global Ship Lease, Inc.
14.96%73.47%18.09%28.97%-22.16%100.35%34.65%78.02%-46.55%-22.67%

Correlation

The correlation between LPG and GSL is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2014

0.31

Over the past year, LPG and GSL have become more correlated (0.54) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LPG:

$1.73B

GSL:

$1.43B

EPS

LPG:

$4.54

GSL:

$10.76

PE Ratio

LPG:

8.94

GSL:

3.63

PEG Ratio

LPG:

0.14

GSL:

0.13

PS Ratio

LPG:

3.60

GSL:

1.82

PB Ratio

LPG:

1.52

GSL:

0.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

LPG:

$481.51M

GSL:

$770.24M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LPG:

$415.02M

GSL:

$409.23M

EBITDA (TTM)

LPG:

$279.22M

GSL:

$528.32M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LPG vs. GSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LPG
LPG Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
LPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
LPG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
LPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
LPG Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

GSL
GSL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSL Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
GSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LPG vs. GSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG) and Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LPGGSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.36

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

3.69

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.63

10.96

-4.33

LPG vs. GSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LPG Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the GSL Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LPG and GSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LPG vs. GSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LPG drawdown since its inception was -78.31%, smaller than the maximum GSL drawdown of -95.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPG and GSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LPGGSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.31%

-95.26%

+16.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.99%

-17.09%

-7.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.89%

-35.82%

-27.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.89%

-47.50%

-15.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.89%

-86.50%

+23.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.92%

-6.25%

-8.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.62%

-58.64%

+16.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.85%

5.75%

+6.10%

Volatility

LPG vs. GSL - Volatility Comparison

Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG) has a higher volatility of 12.41% compared to Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) at 9.92%. This indicates that LPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LPGGSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.41%

9.92%

+2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.44%

20.63%

+10.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.03%

27.85%

+12.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.51%

36.92%

+6.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.27%

54.58%

-6.31%

Dividends

LPG vs. GSL - Dividend Comparison

LPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than GSL's 6.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSL
Global Ship Lease, Inc.
6.15%6.06%7.56%7.57%8.26%3.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.69%
LPG
Dorian LPG Ltd.
7.27%10.07%16.41%9.12%29.02%7.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LPG vs. GSL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dorian LPG Ltd. and Global Ship Lease, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00M160.00M180.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
156.71M
198.08M
(LPG) Total Revenue
(GSL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LPG and GSL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LPG has higher volatility (12.41%) compared to GSL (9.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPG dropped -78.31% vs GSL's -95.26%.

GSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LPG and GSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer