SHPP vs. RSPN
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN).
SHPP and RSPN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SHPP is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Jun 8, 2022. RSPN is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2006. Both SHPP and RSPN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SHPP vs. RSPN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SHPP vs. RSPN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF | 2.70% | 12.88% | 0.76% | 20.86% | -4.12% |
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF | 1.89% | 13.84% | 17.63% | 22.32% | 3.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHPP achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than RSPN's 1.89% return.
SHPP
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- -8.40%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 18.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPN
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- -9.20%
- YTD
- 1.89%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 18.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.50%
- 5Y*
- 11.11%
- 10Y*
- 13.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SHPP vs. RSPN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHPP has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPN's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SHPP vs. RSPN — Risk / Return Rank
SHPP
RSPN
SHPP vs. RSPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHPP | RSPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.94 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 1.45 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.19 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 1.51 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | 5.88 | -0.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHPP | RSPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.94 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.51 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between SHPP and RSPN is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SHPP vs. RSPN - Dividend Comparison
SHPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than RSPN's 0.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF | 1.89% | 1.80% | 2.41% | 2.89% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF | 0.86% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 1.06% | 1.09% | 0.70% | 0.96% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 1.12% | 1.31% | 1.51% |
Drawdowns
SHPP vs. RSPN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHPP drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, smaller than the maximum RSPN drawdown of -59.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHPP and RSPN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHPP | RSPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.57% | -59.61% | +38.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.89% | -12.85% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.40% | -9.74% | +1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.38% | -7.69% | +3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 3.30% | -0.03% |
Volatility
SHPP vs. RSPN - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) at 5.96%. This indicates that SHPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SHPP | RSPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.32% | 5.96% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.05% | 11.55% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.42% | 20.10% | -1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 18.09% | -0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 20.30% | -2.91% |