PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPN vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPN vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPN achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 13.16% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPN has outperformed RSP with an annualized return of 14.49%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively lower 11.94% annualized return.


RSPN

1D
0.53%
1M
-2.05%
6M
4.96%
YTD
11.17%
1Y
16.51%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
14.49%
ALL TIME*
11.48%

RSP

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.05%
6M
9.43%
YTD
13.16%
1Y
20.39%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
11.94%
ALL TIME*
11.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.86B$1.85B$2.06B
$7.22M$5.89M$7.57M

RSPN vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPN
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF
11.17%13.84%17.63%22.32%-8.79%26.07%18.07%33.17%-13.23%23.22%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
13.16%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-7.84%18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPN and RSP is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006

0.83

The correlation between RSPN and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPN vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPN
RSP

Industrials

86.7%
14.6%

Technology

7.1%
16.9%

Basic Materials

3.6%
4.6%

Utilities

1.4%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
9.5%

Financial Services

0.1%
14.8%

Communication Services

-

3.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.2%

Energy

-

4.2%

Healthcare

-

11.8%

Real Estate

-

6.0%

Industrials

RSPN
86.7%
RSP
14.6%

Technology

RSPN
7.1%
RSP
16.9%

Basic Materials

RSPN
3.6%
RSP
4.6%

Utilities

RSPN
1.4%
RSP
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

RSPN
1.0%
RSP
9.5%

Financial Services

RSPN
0.1%
RSP
14.8%

Communication Services

RSPN

-

RSP
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

RSPN

-

RSP
6.2%

Energy

RSPN

-

RSP
4.2%

Healthcare

RSPN

-

RSP
11.8%

Real Estate

RSPN

-

RSP
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPN vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPN
RSPN Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
RSPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPN Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPN Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPN vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPNRSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.29

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

2.43

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.03

9.43

-5.40

RSPN vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPN Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPN and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPN vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPN drawdown since its inception was -59.61%, roughly equal to the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPN and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPNRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.61%

-59.92%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.36%

-7.85%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.89%

-17.81%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

-21.38%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.02%

-39.04%

-2.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-1.23%

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.63%

-6.61%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

2.02%

+1.60%

Volatility

RSPN vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.88%. This indicates that RSPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPNRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

2.88%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.97%

8.59%

+4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.33%

11.76%

+4.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.28%

16.16%

+2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.34%

18.28%

+2.06%

RSPN vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPN vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

RSPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than RSP's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.49%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%
RSPN
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF
0.83%0.86%0.98%1.06%1.09%0.70%0.96%1.33%1.49%1.12%1.31%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPN and RSP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSPN has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to RSP (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPN dropped -59.61% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 10-year performance, RSPN leads with 14.49% vs 11.94% for RSP. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSPN has performed better with a 14.49% return vs 11.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPN.

RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.83% for RSPN.

RSPN is categorized as Industrials Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. RSPN tracks S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPN and 0.20% for RSP.

RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPN and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer