RSPN vs. RSP
RSPN (Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPN is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPN returned 15.13%/yr vs 12.27%/yr for RSP. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.
Performance
RSPN vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPN achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly higher than RSP's 10.32% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPN has outperformed RSP with an annualized return of 15.13%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively lower 12.27% annualized return.
RSPN
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 11.03%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 22.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.21%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 15.13%
RSP
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 10.32%
- 6M
- 9.19%
- 1Y
- 20.44%
- 3Y*
- 15.00%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
RSPN vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF | 11.03% | 13.84% | 17.63% | 22.32% | -8.79% | 26.07% | 18.07% | 33.17% | -13.23% | 23.22% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 10.32% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.66% | 28.91% | -7.84% | 18.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPN and RSP is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006 | 0.84 |
The correlation between RSPN and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSPN vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPN
RSP
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
RSPN
RSP
Technology
RSPN
RSP
Consumer Cyclical
RSPN
RSP
Utilities
RSPN
RSP
Financial Services
RSPN
RSP
Basic Materials
RSPN
-
RSP
Communication Services
RSPN
-
RSP
Consumer Defensive
RSPN
-
RSP
Energy
RSPN
-
RSP
Healthcare
RSPN
-
RSP
Real Estate
RSPN
-
RSP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPN vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank
RSPN
RSP
RSPN vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPN | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.30 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 2.61 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.20 | 9.88 | -3.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPN vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPN drawdown since its inception was -59.61%, roughly equal to the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPN and RSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPN | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.61% | -59.92% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.36% | -7.85% | -4.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.89% | -17.81% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | -21.38% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.02% | -39.04% | -2.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.65% | -1.15% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -6.64% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 2.07% | +1.53% |
Volatility
RSPN vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 3.61%. This indicates that RSPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPN | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 3.61% | +1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.79% | 8.67% | +4.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 11.83% | +4.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 16.20% | +2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 18.37% | +2.04% |
RSPN vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPN vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
RSPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than RSP's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.87% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF | 1.03% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 1.06% | 1.09% | 0.70% | 0.96% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 1.12% | 1.31% | 1.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPN and RSP have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSPN has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to RSP (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPN dropped -59.61% vs RSP's -59.92%.
On 10-year performance, RSPN leads with 15.13% vs 12.27% for RSP. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RSPN has performed better with a 15.13% return vs 12.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPN.
RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.03% for RSPN.
RSPN is categorized as Industrials Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. RSPN tracks S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPN and 0.20% for RSP.
RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPN and RSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer