SHPP vs. FXR
SHPP (Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF) and FXR (First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund) are both Industrials Equities funds - SHPP tracks the Pacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net while FXR tracks the StrataQuant Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SHPP returned 13.21%/yr vs 16.51%/yr for FXR. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SHPP charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for FXR.
Performance
SHPP vs. FXR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHPP achieves a 17.15% return, which is significantly higher than FXR's 8.45% return.
SHPP
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 6.92%
- YTD
- 17.15%
- 6M
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 26.19%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXR
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 20.53%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- 12.70%
SHPP vs. FXR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF | 17.15% | 12.88% | 0.76% | 20.86% | -4.12% |
FXR First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund | 8.45% | 7.56% | 16.19% | 26.98% | -2.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHPP and FXR is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2022 | 0.83 |
The correlation between SHPP and FXR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
SHPP vs. FXR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SHPP
FXR
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
SHPP
FXR
Technology
SHPP
FXR
Consumer Cyclical
SHPP
FXR
Basic Materials
SHPP
-
FXR
Communication Services
SHPP
-
FXR
-
Consumer Defensive
SHPP
-
FXR
-
Energy
SHPP
-
FXR
-
Financial Services
SHPP
-
FXR
Healthcare
SHPP
-
FXR
Real Estate
SHPP
-
FXR
-
Utilities
SHPP
-
FXR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHPP vs. FXR — Risk / Return Rank
SHPP
FXR
SHPP vs. FXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) and First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHPP | FXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.19 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 1.51 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.01 | 4.82 | +4.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHPP | FXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.09 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.37 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
SHPP vs. FXR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHPP drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, smaller than the maximum FXR drawdown of -63.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHPP and FXR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHPP | FXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.57% | -63.81% | +42.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -13.66% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.84% | -26.65% | +7.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -5.35% | +4.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.26% | -10.35% | +6.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 4.27% | -1.36% |
Volatility
SHPP vs. FXR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) is 4.65%, while First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) has a volatility of 5.52%. This indicates that SHPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHPP | FXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 5.52% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.10% | 14.61% | -2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.09% | 18.98% | -3.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 20.57% | -3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 21.92% | -4.47% |
SHPP vs. FXR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHPP has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than FXR's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHPP vs. FXR - Dividend Comparison
SHPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than FXR's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXR First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund | 0.63% | 0.71% | 0.72% | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.52% | 1.06% | 0.74% | 1.18% | 0.55% | 0.52% | 0.62% |
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF | 1.65% | 1.80% | 2.41% | 2.89% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHPP and FXR have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXR has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to SHPP (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHPP dropped -21.57% vs FXR's -63.81%.
On 3-year performance, FXR leads with 16.51% vs 13.21% for SHPP. On fees, SHPP is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, SHPP has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FXR has performed better with a 16.51% return vs 13.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHPP is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXR.
SHPP has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.63% for FXR.
SHPP tracks Pacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net, while FXR tracks StrataQuant Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for SHPP and 0.64% for FXR.
SHPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHPP and FXR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer