PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXR vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXR vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXR achieves a 9.00% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 37.85% return. Over the past 10 years, FXR has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 12.76%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.97% annualized return.


FXR

1D
0.39%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
9.00%
6M
12.12%
1Y
23.27%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
12.76%

XLK

1D
1.25%
1M
22.45%
YTD
37.85%
6M
37.41%
1Y
71.15%
3Y*
34.35%
5Y*
24.55%
10Y*
25.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXR vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXR
First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund
9.00%7.56%16.19%26.98%-16.68%25.07%12.82%33.42%-15.12%24.20%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
37.85%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FXR and XLK is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.65

The correlation between FXR and XLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXR vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXR
XLK

Industrials

70.5%
0.1%

Technology

10.3%
99.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%

-

Basic Materials

6.2%

-

Financial Services

3.4%

-

Healthcare

0.7%

-

Utilities

0.7%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

FXR
70.5%
XLK
0.1%

Technology

FXR
10.3%
XLK
99.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FXR
7.5%
XLK

-

Basic Materials

FXR
6.2%
XLK

-

Financial Services

FXR
3.4%
XLK

-

Healthcare

FXR
0.7%
XLK

-

Utilities

FXR
0.7%
XLK

-

Communication Services

FXR

-

XLK

-

Consumer Defensive

FXR

-

XLK

-

Energy

FXR

-

XLK
0.2%

Real Estate

FXR

-

XLK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXR vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXR
FXR Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXR Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXR Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXR vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXRXLKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

3.44

-2.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.90

4.12

-2.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.55

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

4.56

-2.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.28

15.32

-10.05

FXR vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXR Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXR and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXRXLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

3.44

-2.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.99

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

1.06

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.42

-0.05

Drawdowns

FXR vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXR drawdown since its inception was -63.81%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXR and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXRXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.81%

-82.05%

+18.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.66%

-15.92%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.65%

-25.66%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.85%

-33.56%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.71%

-33.56%

-11.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.86%

0.00%

-4.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.36%

-34.96%

+24.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

4.74%

-0.48%

Volatility

FXR vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) is 5.83%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that FXR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXRXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.83%

6.74%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.61%

16.64%

-2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.98%

20.80%

-1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.57%

24.90%

-4.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.92%

24.49%

-2.57%

FXR vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXR has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXR vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

FXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than XLK's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXR
First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund
0.62%0.71%0.72%0.77%0.92%0.52%1.06%0.74%1.18%0.55%0.52%0.62%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.39%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXR and XLK have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to FXR (5.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXR dropped -63.81% vs XLK's -82.05%.

On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.97% vs 12.76% for FXR. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FXR has been the lower-risk option at 5.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.97% return vs 12.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXR.

FXR has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.39% for XLK.

FXR is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. FXR tracks StrataQuant Industrials Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXR and 0.08% for XLK.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXR and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer