FXR vs. VIS
FXR (First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund) and VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - FXR tracks the StrataQuant Industrials Index while VIS tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXR returned 13.33%/yr vs 14.60%/yr for VIS. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FXR charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VIS.
Performance
FXR vs. VIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXR achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly lower than VIS's 17.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FXR has underperformed VIS with an annualized return of 13.33%, while VIS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.60% annualized return.
FXR
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 20.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.01%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
VIS
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 17.02%
- 6M
- 15.14%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.20%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
FXR vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXR First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund | 9.23% | 7.56% | 16.19% | 26.98% | -16.68% | 25.07% | 12.82% | 33.42% | -15.12% | 24.20% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 17.02% | 18.57% | 16.85% | 22.50% | -8.57% | 20.80% | 12.34% | 30.09% | -14.01% | 21.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXR and VIS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007 | 0.89 |
The correlation between FXR and VIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
FXR vs. VIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXR
VIS
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
FXR
VIS
Technology
FXR
VIS
Consumer Cyclical
FXR
VIS
Basic Materials
FXR
VIS
Financial Services
FXR
VIS
Healthcare
FXR
VIS
Utilities
FXR
VIS
Communication Services
FXR
-
VIS
Consumer Defensive
FXR
-
VIS
-
Energy
FXR
-
VIS
Real Estate
FXR
-
VIS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXR vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank
FXR
VIS
FXR vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXR | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.28 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 2.34 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.70 | 9.68 | -4.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXR vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXR drawdown since its inception was -63.81%, roughly equal to the maximum VIS drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXR and VIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXR | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.81% | -63.51% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.66% | -12.29% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.65% | -20.80% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.85% | -22.96% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.71% | -42.42% | -2.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.67% | -2.14% | -2.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.34% | -8.36% | -1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.39% | 2.97% | +1.42% |
Volatility
FXR vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) is 6.19%, while Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a volatility of 6.60%. This indicates that FXR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXR | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 6.60% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.19% | 14.33% | +0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 17.37% | +2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.67% | 18.49% | +2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.91% | 20.46% | +1.45% |
FXR vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXR has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than VIS's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXR vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison
FXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than VIS's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXR First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund | 0.62% | 0.71% | 0.72% | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.52% | 1.06% | 0.74% | 1.18% | 0.55% | 0.52% | 0.62% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 0.87% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FXR and VIS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VIS has higher volatility (6.60%) compared to FXR (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXR dropped -63.81% vs VIS's -63.51%.
On 10-year performance, VIS leads with 14.60% vs 13.33% for FXR. On fees, VIS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FXR has been the lower-risk option at 6.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIS has performed better with a 14.60% return vs 13.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXR.
VIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.62% for FXR.
FXR tracks StrataQuant Industrials Index, while VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXR and 0.09% for VIS.
VIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXR and VIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer