PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHOE vs. AES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SHOE vs. AES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shoe Station Group, Inc. (SHOE) and The AES Corporation (AES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHOE achieves a -8.93% return, which is significantly lower than AES's 4.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SHOE has underperformed AES with an annualized return of 3.17%, while AES has yielded a comparatively higher 5.59% annualized return.


SHOE

1D
-0.07%
1M
-13.23%
6M
-8.93%
YTD
-8.93%
1Y
-26.06%
3Y*
-12.59%
5Y*
-14.24%
10Y*
3.17%

AES

1D
-0.41%
1M
-0.68%
6M
4.15%
YTD
4.15%
1Y
37.73%
3Y*
-7.24%
5Y*
-7.48%
10Y*
5.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHOE vs. AES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHOE
Shoe Station Group, Inc.
-8.93%-47.64%11.18%28.52%-38.00%101.21%6.51%12.39%26.61%0.39%
AES
The AES Corporation
4.15%18.26%-30.40%-30.88%21.69%5.94%22.16%42.14%39.02%-2.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SHOE and AES is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 1993

0.18

The correlation between SHOE and AES shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SHOE:

$409.71M

AES:

$10.40B

EPS

SHOE:

$1.36

AES:

$2.21

PE Ratio

SHOE:

11.13

AES:

6.60

PS Ratio

SHOE:

0.37

AES:

0.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

SHOE:

$1.13B

AES:

$12.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SHOE:

$409.47M

AES:

$1.77B

EBITDA (TTM)

SHOE:

$87.75M

AES:

$2.73B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHOE vs. AES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHOE
SHOE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SHOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHOE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
SHOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHOE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

AES
AES Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
AES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AES Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AES Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AES Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
AES Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHOE vs. AES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shoe Station Group, Inc. (SHOE) and The AES Corporation (AES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHOEAESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.29

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

2.00

-2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.00

3.59

-4.59

SHOE vs. AES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHOE Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the AES Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHOE and AES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHOE vs. AES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHOE drawdown since its inception was -84.87%, smaller than the maximum AES drawdown of -98.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHOE and AES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHOEAESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.87%

-98.65%

+13.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.25%

-18.98%

-22.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.06%

-53.33%

-12.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.06%

-63.43%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.53%

-63.43%

-5.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.46%

-62.34%

-3.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.80%

-57.03%

+22.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.08%

10.53%

+15.55%

Volatility

SHOE vs. AES - Volatility Comparison

Shoe Station Group, Inc. (SHOE) has a higher volatility of 12.81% compared to The AES Corporation (AES) at 1.09%. This indicates that SHOE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHOEAESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.81%

1.09%

+11.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.19%

25.09%

+7.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.88%

41.24%

+8.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.67%

37.72%

+9.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.58%

35.96%

+17.62%

Dividends

SHOE vs. AES - Dividend Comparison

SHOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, less than AES's 4.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AES
The AES Corporation
4.83%4.91%5.36%3.45%2.20%2.48%2.44%2.74%3.60%4.43%3.79%4.18%
SHOE
Shoe Station Group, Inc.
4.11%3.47%1.59%1.36%1.42%0.65%0.89%0.89%0.93%1.08%1.00%1.08%

Financials

SHOE vs. AES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Shoe Station Group, Inc. and The AES Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
270.73M
3.18B
(SHOE) Total Revenue
(AES) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SHOE vs. AES - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Shoe Station Group, Inc. and The AES Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
33.3%
0
Portfolio components
SHOE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Shoe Station Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 90.10M and revenue of 270.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.

AES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The AES Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SHOE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Shoe Station Group, Inc. reported an operating income of -6.04M and revenue of 270.73M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.

AES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The AES Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

SHOE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Shoe Station Group, Inc. reported a net income of -5.63M and revenue of 270.73M, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.

AES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The AES Corporation reported a net income of 201.00M and revenue of 3.18B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SHOE and AES have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHOE has higher volatility (12.81%) compared to AES (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHOE dropped -84.87% vs AES's -98.65%.

AES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHOE and AES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer