SHOE vs. UNM
SHOE (Shoe Station Group, Inc.) and UNM (Unum Group) are both stocks. SHOE operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while UNM operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, SHOE returned 3.17%/yr vs 14.99%/yr for UNM. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SHOE vs. UNM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHOE achieves a -8.93% return, which is significantly lower than UNM's 20.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SHOE has underperformed UNM with an annualized return of 3.17%, while UNM has yielded a comparatively higher 14.99% annualized return.
SHOE
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -13.23%
- 6M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- -8.93%
- 1Y
- -26.06%
- 3Y*
- -12.59%
- 5Y*
- -14.24%
- 10Y*
- 3.17%
UNM
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 20.58%
- YTD
- 20.58%
- 1Y
- 16.40%
- 3Y*
- 27.69%
- 5Y*
- 30.34%
- 10Y*
- 14.99%
SHOE vs. UNM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHOE Shoe Station Group, Inc. | -8.93% | -47.64% | 11.18% | 28.52% | -38.00% | 101.21% | 6.51% | 12.39% | 26.61% | 0.39% |
UNM Unum Group | 20.58% | 8.56% | 66.31% | 13.72% | 73.56% | 11.87% | -16.22% | 2.63% | -45.22% | 27.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHOE and UNM is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 1993 | 0.26 |
The correlation between SHOE and UNM shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.34 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SHOE:
$409.71M
UNM:
$14.75B
SHOE:
$1.36
UNM:
$4.66
SHOE:
11.13
UNM:
19.81
SHOE:
0.37
UNM:
1.16
SHOE:
0.61
UNM:
1.39
SHOE:
$1.13B
UNM:
$13.30B
SHOE:
$409.47M
UNM:
$4.51B
SHOE:
$87.75M
UNM:
$1.24B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHOE vs. UNM — Risk / Return Rank
SHOE
UNM
SHOE vs. UNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shoe Station Group, Inc. (SHOE) and Unum Group (UNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHOE | UNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.15 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 1.03 | -1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 2.24 | -3.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHOE vs. UNM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHOE drawdown since its inception was -84.87%, smaller than the maximum UNM drawdown of -89.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHOE and UNM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHOE | UNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.87% | -89.38% | +4.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.25% | -16.04% | -25.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.06% | -17.94% | -48.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.06% | -20.95% | -45.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.53% | -81.06% | +12.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.46% | -0.42% | -65.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.80% | -32.63% | -2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.08% | 7.34% | +18.74% |
Volatility
SHOE vs. UNM - Volatility Comparison
Shoe Station Group, Inc. (SHOE) has a higher volatility of 12.81% compared to Unum Group (UNM) at 6.52%. This indicates that SHOE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHOE | UNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.81% | 6.52% | +6.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.19% | 15.31% | +16.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.88% | 24.89% | +24.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.67% | 29.91% | +17.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.58% | 37.44% | +16.14% |
Dividends
SHOE vs. UNM - Dividend Comparison
SHOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than UNM's 1.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHOE Shoe Station Group, Inc. | 4.11% | 3.47% | 1.59% | 1.36% | 1.42% | 0.65% | 0.89% | 0.89% | 0.93% | 1.08% | 1.00% | 1.08% |
UNM Unum Group | 1.99% | 2.27% | 2.15% | 3.07% | 3.07% | 4.76% | 4.97% | 3.74% | 3.34% | 1.57% | 1.75% | 2.10% |
Financials
SHOE vs. UNM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Shoe Station Group, Inc. and Unum Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SHOE vs. UNM - Profitability Comparison
SHOE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Shoe Station Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 90.10M and revenue of 270.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.
UNM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Unum Group reported a gross profit of 1.35B and revenue of 3.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.
SHOE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Shoe Station Group, Inc. reported an operating income of -6.04M and revenue of 270.73M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.
UNM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Unum Group reported an operating income of 302.70M and revenue of 3.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.
SHOE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Shoe Station Group, Inc. reported a net income of -5.63M and revenue of 270.73M, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.
UNM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Unum Group reported a net income of 232.00M and revenue of 3.36B, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SHOE and UNM have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHOE has higher volatility (12.81%) compared to UNM (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHOE dropped -84.87% vs UNM's -89.38%.
UNM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHOE and UNM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer