SHOE vs. KFRC
SHOE (Shoe Station Group, Inc.) and KFRC (Kforce Inc.) are both stocks. SHOE operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while KFRC operates in Staffing & Employment Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, SHOE returned 3.17%/yr vs 14.31%/yr for KFRC. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SHOE vs. KFRC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHOE achieves a -8.93% return, which is significantly lower than KFRC's 68.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SHOE has underperformed KFRC with an annualized return of 3.17%, while KFRC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.31% annualized return.
SHOE
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -13.23%
- 6M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- -8.93%
- 1Y
- -26.06%
- 3Y*
- -12.59%
- 5Y*
- -14.24%
- 10Y*
- 3.17%
KFRC
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 68.47%
- YTD
- 68.47%
- 1Y
- 22.73%
- 3Y*
- -3.45%
- 5Y*
- -1.50%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
SHOE vs. KFRC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHOE Shoe Station Group, Inc. | -8.93% | -47.64% | 11.18% | 28.52% | -38.00% | 101.21% | 6.51% | 12.39% | 26.61% | 0.39% |
KFRC Kforce Inc. | 68.47% | -43.07% | -14.03% | 26.14% | -25.69% | 81.56% | 8.49% | 31.03% | 24.68% | 11.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHOE and KFRC is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 1995 | 0.26 |
The correlation between SHOE and KFRC shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SHOE:
$409.71M
KFRC:
$908.18M
SHOE:
$1.36
KFRC:
$1.99
SHOE:
11.13
KFRC:
25.63
SHOE:
0.37
KFRC:
0.67
SHOE:
0.61
KFRC:
7.46
SHOE:
$1.13B
KFRC:
$1.33B
SHOE:
$409.47M
KFRC:
$361.86M
SHOE:
$87.75M
KFRC:
$53.65M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHOE vs. KFRC — Risk / Return Rank
SHOE
KFRC
SHOE vs. KFRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shoe Station Group, Inc. (SHOE) and Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHOE | KFRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.15 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 0.49 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 0.76 | -1.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHOE vs. KFRC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHOE drawdown since its inception was -84.87%, smaller than the maximum KFRC drawdown of -94.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHOE and KFRC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHOE | KFRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.87% | -94.60% | +9.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.25% | -47.03% | +5.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.06% | -64.72% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.06% | -66.41% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.53% | -66.41% | -2.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.46% | -27.76% | -37.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.80% | -42.70% | +7.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.08% | 29.80% | -3.72% |
Volatility
SHOE vs. KFRC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Shoe Station Group, Inc. (SHOE) is 12.81%, while Kforce Inc. (KFRC) has a volatility of 14.88%. This indicates that SHOE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KFRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHOE | KFRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.81% | 14.88% | -2.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.19% | 48.83% | -16.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.88% | 69.16% | -19.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.67% | 41.96% | +5.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.58% | 39.70% | +13.88% |
Dividends
SHOE vs. KFRC - Dividend Comparison
SHOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than KFRC's 3.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KFRC Kforce Inc. | 3.10% | 5.05% | 2.68% | 2.13% | 2.19% | 1.30% | 1.90% | 1.81% | 1.94% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.78% |
SHOE Shoe Station Group, Inc. | 4.11% | 3.47% | 1.59% | 1.36% | 1.42% | 0.65% | 0.89% | 0.89% | 0.93% | 1.08% | 1.00% | 1.08% |
Financials
SHOE vs. KFRC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Shoe Station Group, Inc. and Kforce Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SHOE vs. KFRC - Profitability Comparison
SHOE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Shoe Station Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 90.10M and revenue of 270.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.
KFRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kforce Inc. reported a gross profit of 90.07M and revenue of 330.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.
SHOE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Shoe Station Group, Inc. reported an operating income of -6.04M and revenue of 270.73M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.
KFRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kforce Inc. reported an operating income of 12.01M and revenue of 330.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.
SHOE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Shoe Station Group, Inc. reported a net income of -5.63M and revenue of 270.73M, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.
KFRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kforce Inc. reported a net income of 7.93M and revenue of 330.36M, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SHOE and KFRC have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KFRC has higher volatility (14.88%) compared to SHOE (12.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHOE dropped -84.87% vs KFRC's -94.60%.
KFRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHOE and KFRC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer