SH vs. SPYG
SH (ProShares Short S&P500) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SH is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 (-100%), while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SH returned -12.83%/yr vs 17.91%/yr for SPYG. At a correlation of -0.94, they often move in opposite directions. SH charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
SH vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SH achieves a -6.39% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, SH has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of -12.83%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.91% annualized return.
SH
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- -6.39%
- 6M
- -6.43%
- 1Y
- -15.90%
- 3Y*
- -11.96%
- 5Y*
- -8.68%
- 10Y*
- -12.83%
SPYG
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 29.17%
- 3Y*
- 25.85%
- 5Y*
- 14.92%
- 10Y*
- 17.91%
SH vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -6.39% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | 18.98% | -24.21% | -25.09% | -22.12% | 4.93% | -17.36% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 9.70% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SH and SPYG is -0.93, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006 | -0.94 |
The correlation between SH and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.95 to -0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
SH vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SH
SPYG
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SH
SPYG
Basic Materials
SH
-
SPYG
Communication Services
SH
-
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
SH
-
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
SH
-
SPYG
Energy
SH
-
SPYG
Healthcare
SH
-
SPYG
Industrials
SH
-
SPYG
Real Estate
SH
-
SPYG
Technology
SH
-
SPYG
Utilities
SH
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SH vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
SH
SPYG
SH vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SH | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.29 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 2.01 | -2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | 8.08 | -9.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SH vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SH drawdown since its inception was -94.66%, which is greater than SPYG's maximum drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SH and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SH | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.66% | -67.63% | -27.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.16% | -13.76% | -4.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.82% | -22.14% | -16.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.53% | -32.67% | -11.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.12% | -32.67% | -43.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.53% | -4.65% | -89.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.75% | -24.30% | -43.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.13% | 3.42% | +6.71% |
Volatility
SH vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) is 4.33%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that SH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SH | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 6.33% | -2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.59% | 13.48% | -3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 16.81% | -4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 21.27% | -4.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 20.70% | -2.66% |
SH vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SH has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
SH vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than SPYG's 0.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.43% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.48% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SH and SPYG have a correlation of -0.93, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYG has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to SH (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SH dropped -94.66% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 17.91% vs -12.83% for SH. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 17.91% return vs -12.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SH.
SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 0.48% for SPYG.
SH is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. SH tracks S&P 500 (-100%), while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SH and 0.04% for SPYG.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SH and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer