SFYF vs. PTNQ
SFYF (SoFi Social 50 ETF) and PTNQ (Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFYF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the SoFi Social 50 Index, while PTNQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SFYF returned 10.87%/yr vs 10.06%/yr for PTNQ. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SFYF charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PTNQ.
Performance
SFYF vs. PTNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SFYF having a 11.41% return and PTNQ slightly lower at 10.91%.
SFYF
- 1D
- 3.01%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 14.10%
- YTD
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- 28.77%
- 3Y*
- 29.84%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.86%
PTNQ
- 1D
- 3.35%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 20.79%
- 3Y*
- 13.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- 15.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.31M | $2.66M | $2.83M | |
| $152.71K | $195.32K | $232.95K |
SFYF vs. PTNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFYF SoFi Social 50 ETF | 11.41% | 30.00% | 44.62% | 56.80% | -47.73% | 35.83% | 33.65% | 5.50% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 10.91% | 7.18% | 15.47% | 34.65% | -16.00% | 13.16% | 29.38% | 14.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFYF and PTNQ is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | 0.78 |
The correlation between SFYF and PTNQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFYF vs. PTNQ — Risk / Return Rank
SFYF
PTNQ
SFYF vs. PTNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFYF | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.20 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 1.78 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.41 | 5.15 | +0.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFYF vs. PTNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFYF drawdown since its inception was -56.09%, which is greater than PTNQ's maximum drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFYF and PTNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFYF | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.09% | -28.07% | -28.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.18% | -11.76% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.45% | -14.19% | -12.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.09% | -18.47% | -37.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.63% | -2.99% | -1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.34% | -5.67% | -10.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.33% | 4.05% | +1.28% |
Volatility
SFYF vs. PTNQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) is 6.99%, while Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that SFYF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFYF | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.99% | 7.65% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.40% | 15.52% | +0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.69% | 18.94% | +1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.44% | 13.88% | +15.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.59% | 16.66% | +13.93% |
SFYF vs. PTNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFYF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PTNQ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFYF vs. PTNQ - Dividend Comparison
SFYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than PTNQ's 0.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 0.79% | 0.88% | 1.96% | 1.47% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.32% | 0.30% | 0.22% |
SFYF SoFi Social 50 ETF | 0.36% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 1.71% | 1.19% | 0.26% | 0.40% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, SFYF and PTNQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PTNQ has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to SFYF (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFYF dropped -56.09% vs PTNQ's -28.07%.
On 5-year performance, SFYF leads with 10.87% vs 10.06% for PTNQ. On fees, SFYF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SFYF has been the lower-risk option at 6.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SFYF has performed better with a 10.87% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SFYF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTNQ.
PTNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.36% for SFYF.
SFYF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PTNQ is Large Cap Blend Equities. SFYF tracks SoFi Social 50 Index, while PTNQ tracks Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SFYF and 0.65% for PTNQ.
SFYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFYF and PTNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer