PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFYF vs. PTNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFYF vs. PTNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFYF achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly higher than PTNQ's 13.51% return.


SFYF

1D
-0.04%
1M
8.49%
YTD
14.80%
6M
13.77%
1Y
44.18%
3Y*
36.16%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*

PTNQ

1D
-0.52%
1M
8.66%
YTD
13.51%
6M
12.12%
1Y
31.85%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
16.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFYF vs. PTNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SFYF
SoFi Social 50 ETF
14.80%30.00%44.62%56.80%-47.73%35.83%33.65%4.95%
PTNQ
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
13.51%7.18%15.47%34.65%-16.00%13.16%29.38%14.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SFYF and PTNQ is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019

0.78

The correlation between SFYF and PTNQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.89 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SFYF vs. PTNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SFYF
PTNQ

Technology

38.5%
53.2%

Consumer Cyclical

22.9%
12.9%

Communication Services

13.8%
16.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
4.8%

Financial Services

5.5%
0.3%

Healthcare

5.5%
5.3%

Industrials

3.5%
4.3%

Energy

2.1%
0.5%

Real Estate

1.2%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

SFYF
38.5%
PTNQ
53.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SFYF
22.9%
PTNQ
12.9%

Communication Services

SFYF
13.8%
PTNQ
16.1%

Consumer Defensive

SFYF
6.8%
PTNQ
4.8%

Financial Services

SFYF
5.5%
PTNQ
0.3%

Healthcare

SFYF
5.5%
PTNQ
5.3%

Industrials

SFYF
3.5%
PTNQ
4.3%

Energy

SFYF
2.1%
PTNQ
0.5%

Real Estate

SFYF
1.2%
PTNQ
0.1%

Basic Materials

SFYF

-

PTNQ
1.1%

Utilities

SFYF

-

PTNQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFYF vs. PTNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFYF
SFYF Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SFYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFYF Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SFYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFYF Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

PTNQ
PTNQ Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PTNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PTNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFYF vs. PTNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFYFPTNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.35

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

2.72

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.71

9.24

+0.47

SFYF vs. PTNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFYF Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the PTNQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFYF and PTNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFYFPTNQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.06

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.92

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.81

-0.19

Drawdowns

SFYF vs. PTNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFYF drawdown since its inception was -56.09%, which is greater than PTNQ's maximum drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFYF and PTNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFYFPTNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.09%

-28.07%

-28.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.18%

-11.76%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.45%

-14.19%

-12.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.09%

-18.47%

-37.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-0.72%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.57%

-5.69%

-10.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

3.46%

+1.11%

Volatility

SFYF vs. PTNQ - Volatility Comparison

SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) at 4.64%. This indicates that SFYF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFYFPTNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

4.64%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.20%

11.47%

+1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.73%

15.56%

+3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.28%

12.89%

+16.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.67%

16.37%

+14.30%

SFYF vs. PTNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFYF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PTNQ's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFYF vs. PTNQ - Dividend Comparison

SFYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than PTNQ's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTNQ
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
0.78%0.88%1.96%1.47%0.62%0.00%0.16%0.44%0.45%0.32%0.30%0.22%
SFYF
SoFi Social 50 ETF
0.29%0.33%0.31%1.71%1.19%0.26%0.40%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFYF and PTNQ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFYF has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to PTNQ (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFYF dropped -56.09% vs PTNQ's -28.07%.

On 5-year performance, SFYF leads with 12.33% vs 11.75% for PTNQ. On fees, SFYF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PTNQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SFYF has performed better with a 12.33% return vs 11.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SFYF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTNQ.

PTNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.29% for SFYF.

SFYF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PTNQ is Large Cap Blend Equities. SFYF tracks SoFi Social 50 Index, while PTNQ tracks Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SFYF and 0.65% for PTNQ.

SFYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFYF and PTNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer