SFTY vs. TBFG

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SFTY (Horizon Managed Risk ETF) and TBFG (The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past year, SFTY returned 21.14% vs 18.47% for TBFG. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SFTY charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for TBFG.

Performance

SFTY vs. TBFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFTY achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly higher than TBFG's 8.81% return.

SFTY

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.52%
• 6M: 8.56%
• YTD: 10.02%
• 1Y: 21.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TBFG

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: -1.24%
• 6M: 6.14%
• YTD: 8.81%
• 1Y: 18.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFTY vs. TBFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SFTY Horizon Managed Risk ETF	10.02%	12.10%
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF	8.81%	10.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SFTY and TBFG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.88

The correlation between SFTY and TBFG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SFTY vs. TBFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFTY

SFTY Risk / Return Rank: 68
SFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
SFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
SFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 67
SFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 76

TBFG

TBFG Risk / Return Rank: 66
TBFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
TBFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
TBFG Omega Ratio Rank: 67
TBFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
TBFG Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFTY vs. TBFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SFTY	TBFG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	1.74	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	2.43	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.32	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	2.43	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.99	10.08	+0.92

SFTY vs. TBFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the TBFG Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFTY and TBFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SFTY vs. TBFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFTY drawdown since its inception was -8.64%, smaller than the maximum TBFG drawdown of -13.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFTY and TBFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SFTY	TBFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.64%	-13.43%	+4.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.64%	-7.63%	-1.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-1.75%	+1.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.12%	-1.61%	+0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	1.84%	+0.09%

Volatility

SFTY vs. TBFG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY) is 2.82%, while The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) has a volatility of 3.16%. This indicates that SFTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SFTY	TBFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	3.16%	-0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.43%	9.14%	+0.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.01%	10.65%	+1.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.84%	11.13%	+0.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.84%	11.13%	+0.71%

SFTY vs. TBFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFTY has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than TBFG's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

SFTY vs. TBFG - Dividend Comparison

SFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than TBFG's 2.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
SFTY Horizon Managed Risk ETF	0.17%	0.19%	0.00%
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF	2.41%	2.65%	2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SFTY and TBFG in my portfolio?

SFTY and TBFG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SFTY or TBFG?

TBFG has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to SFTY (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFTY dropped -8.64% vs TBFG's -13.43%.

Which ETF is better, SFTY or TBFG?

On 1-year performance, SFTY leads with 21.14% vs 18.47% for TBFG. On fees, TBFG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, SFTY has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SFTY or TBFG?

Over the 1-year period, SFTY has performed better with a 21.14% return vs 18.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SFTY or TBFG?

TBFG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for SFTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SFTY or TBFG?

TBFG has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.17% for SFTY.

What is the main difference between SFTY and TBFG?

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and The Brinsmere Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for SFTY and 0.42% for TBFG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SFTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.