PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFTY vs. TBFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFTY vs. TBFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SFTY having a 10.20% return and TBFG slightly higher at 10.44%.


SFTY

1D
0.32%
1M
4.19%
YTD
10.20%
6M
10.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TBFG

1D
0.08%
1M
3.51%
YTD
10.44%
6M
11.28%
1Y
24.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFTY vs. TBFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SFTY
Horizon Managed Risk ETF
10.20%11.73%
TBFG
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
10.44%9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SFTY and TBFG is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.88

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFTY vs. TBFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFTY

TBFG
TBFG Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TBFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBFG Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TBFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBFG Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFTY vs. TBFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SFTY vs. TBFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFTYTBFGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.15

1.39

+0.76

Drawdowns

SFTY vs. TBFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFTY drawdown since its inception was -8.64%, smaller than the maximum TBFG drawdown of -13.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFTY and TBFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFTYTBFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.64%

-13.43%

+4.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

-0.28%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.09%

-1.62%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

Volatility

SFTY vs. TBFG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFTYTBFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.62%

9.73%

+1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.62%

10.94%

+0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.62%

10.94%

+0.68%

SFTY vs. TBFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFTY has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than TBFG's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFTY vs. TBFG - Dividend Comparison

SFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than TBFG's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
SFTY
Horizon Managed Risk ETF
0.17%0.19%0.00%
TBFG
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
2.35%2.65%2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFTY and TBFG have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TBFG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TBFG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for SFTY.

TBFG has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.17% for SFTY.

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and The Brinsmere Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for SFTY and 0.42% for TBFG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFTY and TBFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer