PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFTY vs. BENJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFTY vs. BENJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY) and Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFTY achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly higher than BENJ's 1.89% return.


SFTY

1D
-0.71%
1M
1.41%
6M
7.64%
YTD
9.81%
1Y
21.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BENJ

1D
0.02%
1M
0.30%
6M
1.74%
YTD
1.89%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFTY vs. BENJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SFTY
Horizon Managed Risk ETF
9.81%12.10%
BENJ
Horizon Landmark ETF
1.89%2.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SFTY and BENJ is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFTY vs. BENJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFTY
SFTY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

BENJ
BENJ Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BENJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BENJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BENJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BENJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BENJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFTY vs. BENJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY) and Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SFTYBENJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

4.60

-3.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

9.88

-7.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.99

46.53

-35.53

SFTY vs. BENJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the BENJ Sharpe Ratio of 5.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFTY and BENJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SFTY vs. BENJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFTY drawdown since its inception was -8.64%, which is greater than BENJ's maximum drawdown of -0.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFTY and BENJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFTYBENJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.64%

-0.39%

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-0.39%

-8.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

0.00%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.13%

-0.02%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

0.08%

+1.85%

Volatility

SFTY vs. BENJ - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) at 0.16%. This indicates that SFTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BENJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFTYBENJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

0.16%

+3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

0.27%

+9.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.03%

0.68%

+11.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.90%

0.60%

+11.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.90%

0.60%

+11.30%

SFTY vs. BENJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFTY has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than BENJ's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFTY vs. BENJ - Dividend Comparison

SFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, while BENJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
BENJ
Horizon Landmark ETF
0.00%0.00%
SFTY
Horizon Managed Risk ETF
0.17%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFTY and BENJ have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFTY has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to BENJ (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFTY dropped -8.64% vs BENJ's -0.39%.

On 1-year performance, SFTY leads with 21.14% vs 3.84% for BENJ. On fees, BENJ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BENJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SFTY has performed better with a 21.14% return vs 3.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BENJ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for SFTY.

SFTY has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for BENJ.

SFTY is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while BENJ is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for SFTY and 0.40% for BENJ.

BENJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.66 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFTY and BENJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer