TBFG vs. GDT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT).

TBFG and GDT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TBFG is an actively managed fund by The Brinsmere Funds. It was launched on Jan 12, 2024. GDT is an actively managed fund by WisdomTree. It was launched on Jan 22, 2026.

Performance

TBFG vs. GDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TBFG vs. GDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF	-2.11%
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund	-2.55%

Returns By Period

TBFG

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: -4.08%
• YTD: 0.74%
• 6M: 3.24%
• 1Y: 16.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GDT

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: -10.12%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBFG vs. GDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBFG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than GDT's 0.30% expense ratio.

TBFG

The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF

GDT

WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund

Return for Risk

TBFG vs. GDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBFG

TBFG Risk / Return Rank: 72
TBFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
TBFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
TBFG Omega Ratio Rank: 74
TBFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
TBFG Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBFG vs. GDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TBFG	GDT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.17	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TBFG	GDT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.06	-0.30	+1.36

Correlation

The correlation between TBFG and GDT is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TBFG vs. GDT - Dividend Comparison

TBFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than GDT's 0.09% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF	2.57%	2.65%	2.43%
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TBFG vs. GDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBFG drawdown since its inception was -13.43%, smaller than the maximum GDT drawdown of -18.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBFG and GDT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBFG	GDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.43%	-18.06%	+4.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.82%	-11.04%	+6.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.69%	-7.38%	+5.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TBFG	GDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.78%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.82%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.38%	42.83%	-30.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.99%	42.83%	-31.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.99%	42.83%	-31.84%