SFTY vs. DIVN
SFTY (Horizon Managed Risk ETF) and DIVN (Horizon Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFTY is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Horizon, while DIVN is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Horizon. Over the past year, SFTY returned 21.14% vs 19.47% for DIVN. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SFTY charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for DIVN.
Performance
SFTY vs. DIVN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFTY achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly lower than DIVN's 13.69% return.
SFTY
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 1Y
- 21.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIVN
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- YTD
- 13.69%
- 1Y
- 19.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFTY vs. DIVN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SFTY Horizon Managed Risk ETF | 9.81% | 12.10% |
DIVN Horizon Dividend Income ETF | 13.69% | 8.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFTY and DIVN is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFTY vs. DIVN — Risk / Return Rank
SFTY
DIVN
SFTY vs. DIVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY) and Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFTY | DIVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.33 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 3.52 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.99 | 9.71 | +1.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFTY vs. DIVN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFTY drawdown since its inception was -8.64%, which is greater than DIVN's maximum drawdown of -5.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFTY and DIVN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFTY | DIVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.64% | -5.55% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -5.55% | -3.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -0.31% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.13% | -1.39% | +0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 2.01% | -0.08% |
Volatility
SFTY vs. DIVN - Volatility Comparison
Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) at 2.91%. This indicates that SFTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFTY | DIVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 2.91% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.45% | 7.37% | +2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.03% | 10.42% | +1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.90% | 10.44% | +1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.90% | 10.44% | +1.46% |
SFTY vs. DIVN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFTY has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVN's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFTY vs. DIVN - Dividend Comparison
SFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than DIVN's 3.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DIVN Horizon Dividend Income ETF | 3.45% | 1.47% |
SFTY Horizon Managed Risk ETF | 0.17% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFTY and DIVN have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SFTY has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to DIVN (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFTY dropped -8.64% vs DIVN's -5.55%.
On 1-year performance, SFTY leads with 21.14% vs 19.47% for DIVN. On fees, DIVN is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, DIVN has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SFTY has performed better with a 21.14% return vs 19.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVN is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for SFTY.
DIVN has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 0.17% for SFTY.
SFTY is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while DIVN is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for SFTY and 0.70% for DIVN.
DIVN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFTY and DIVN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer