PortfoliosLab logo
TBFG vs. MOOD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TBFG and MOOD is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

TBFG vs. MOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.15%
21.06%
TBFG
MOOD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TBFG:

0.20

MOOD:

1.25

Sortino Ratio

TBFG:

0.42

MOOD:

1.91

Omega Ratio

TBFG:

1.06

MOOD:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

TBFG:

0.23

MOOD:

2.26

Martin Ratio

TBFG:

0.89

MOOD:

7.51

Ulcer Index

TBFG:

3.40%

MOOD:

1.67%

Daily Std Dev

TBFG:

12.53%

MOOD:

9.41%

Max Drawdown

TBFG:

-13.42%

MOOD:

-14.34%

Current Drawdown

TBFG:

-5.07%

MOOD:

-0.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBFG achieves a -1.20% return, which is significantly lower than MOOD's 6.47% return.


TBFG

YTD

-1.20%

1M

3.80%

6M

-4.03%

1Y

2.54%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MOOD

YTD

6.47%

1M

2.77%

6M

3.21%

1Y

11.60%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TBFG vs. MOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBFG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than MOOD's 0.68% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TBFG vs. MOOD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBFG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TBFG is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TBFG is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TBFG is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TBFG is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TBFG is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TBFG is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

MOOD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MOOD is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MOOD is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MOOD is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MOOD is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MOOD is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MOOD is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TBFG vs. MOOD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TBFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the MOOD Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBFG and MOOD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00Jan 19Jan 26Feb 02Feb 09Feb 16Feb 23Mar 02Mar 09Mar 16Mar 23Mar 30Apr 06Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27May 04
0.20
1.25
TBFG
MOOD

Dividends

TBFG vs. MOOD - Dividend Comparison

TBFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than MOOD's 1.25% yield.


TTM202420232022
TBFG
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
2.64%2.43%0.00%0.00%
MOOD
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF
1.25%1.33%1.34%1.43%

Drawdowns

TBFG vs. MOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBFG drawdown since its inception was -13.42%, smaller than the maximum MOOD drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBFG and MOOD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-5.07%
-0.27%
TBFG
MOOD

Volatility

TBFG vs. MOOD - Volatility Comparison

The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) at 1.84%. This indicates that TBFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3.44%
1.84%
TBFG
MOOD